this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
623 points (78.1% liked)

World News

39104 readers
2773 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

…”than being vegan”? Look, I don’t care if you’re vegan and not and I’ll respect you if you are, but the title already makes this article sound biased and untrustworthy.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

So triggered, so fast.

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Study of greenhouse gas emission of different alimentation choices finds an expected result

this is biased and untrustworthy!

This is not how biases work, every result you don't like doesn't make the study biased

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To add on to this, the title should really end with, "than being vegetarian", or else the title should be " Consuming animal products creates four time more greenhouse gases than being vegan,..."

It's not really a 1 to 1 comparison if you're comparing a meat eater with someone who doesn't consume milk, meat, eggs, or any other animal products. You can also have meat eaters that don't consume milk due to allergies and such.

Plus, technically speaking (with cultured meat on the rise), there could be vegans that aren't vegetarian, as vegans could still eat cultured meat.

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Titel translation is “Eating something creates more greenhouse gasses than being something.”

So… “Eating meat creates more greenhouse gasses than being meat.”

“Eating grass creates more greenhouse gasses, than being grass.”