this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
742 points (98.2% liked)
Asklemmy
45249 readers
8 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Copy pasting passwords is a sign of a deficient security system. In most cases, it would not even be possible to copy a secret. The secrets should be stored in a write only device which then performs the authorization. You send it tokens, it encrypts them with the private key. You send back the encrypted token which is then validated against your public key.
Private keys never hit your ram in clear text
That would be great but a site with a password field doesn't support such a system anyway
Sign-in with client certificates is built-in to attached for a very long time.
You just put the certificate in a smartcard or get vaultwarden to do the encryption
This is making perfect the enemy of good. What's actually going to happen is people are going to use "password123" because they can remember it.
Passwords are the enemy