open source exists elsewhere and security through obscurity is a terrible, strawman argument
zwekihoyy
those were some bullshit bullet points lmao
it is not more secure for the average user. sure it can be hardened to a great degree but that takes proper knowledge of the underlying architecture. for the average user's ootb experience, Linux is the least secure option.
that's the joke
some carriers do but Google runs their own as well because carriers were slow to adopt.
out of curiosity, are you aware what changes exactly make the Play Integrity API eligibility requirements not able to be met? with Google play installed, the compatibility layer should be able to facilitate the necessary communication, I would think.
or are they just arbitrarily saying anything that's not stock isn't eligible?
i couldn't think of anything either I was just covering all my bases lol
ownership of tangibles and intangibles (specifically information) are entirely different, regardless how you wanna define ownership or whatever.
iirc, Matrix is a non profit, idk where you're getting it's for profit.
all your first points are generally correct, as far as the last one however, that is the entire point in running your own instance. too many uses on matrix.org. all fedi platforms have this issue as well.
you understand there is a difference between personal property and corporate property right? and then beyond that, there is a difference between owning a tangible product and information.
the argument that Linux is less popular therefore less targeted is both misguided and a security through obscurity based argument. Linux is the most used server operating system and servers are targeted more than any individual and those server based malware often works on desktop versions as well.