Well, this is all very subjective. Idk what you do for a living, but there are massive differences between fact to fact communication and IM/email.
To say it's outdated is just insane and flat wrong.
Well, this is all very subjective. Idk what you do for a living, but there are massive differences between fact to fact communication and IM/email.
To say it's outdated is just insane and flat wrong.
Fuck man, don't throw a grenade into the room without warning
Lotta them exist. Always have and always will. This is how you begin the "have and have not" groups.
To your first point, why? You know what the Internet is like outside the fediverse right?
To your second, I guess you can. Don't know what it has to do with the subject at hand
Idk, you tell me. I'm suggesting that scarce resources not owned by anyone will get used by those who take it. This is a fact. What then? Is it bad? Is it ok? Pretending it's not a thing is to deny reality and all of human/life history
That's the thing though: someone will. That's what regulations, ownership (collective or individual), and laws are for. That's why it's not a simple thing.
What if one person comes in and takes it all? Don't even need companies, just individuals.
That's the tragedy of the commons.
The ol' double tap never fails
Content warnings seem to be useless or add stress
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026231186625