You’d be an idiot not to. That was the very first thing I thought of.
whatisallthis
joined 1 year ago
It’s honestly like someone comes up to you and tells you that you have to win class president for the local kindergarten.
You’d love to talk about stuff like human rights or healthcare but you know that if you want to win the election you need to promise them longer naps and candy every Monday.
I think that any study you find over the past 30 years will show that while online relationships can be meaningful in some cases, the average person will not form as strong a connection as they would in person.
Because the #1 reason why employees will stay at a job that underpays them is because they like the people they work with. And you can’t form those bonds remotely.
Even if they do remove it, I'm sure a browser extension will just step in to mimic it as best as possible.
I don’t use Facebook so I don’t know -
Why can’t you just have a group text with your family.
Imagine when some popular show decides to make seasons 1-3 on one platform and then 4,5 on a different one and then 6 on another different one.
Salon.com only exists to provide a headline for people to circle-jerk about in the comments on their favorite social media platform.
Republicans have those too. But this is a Democrat one.
The psychological ramifications of that are immense. It would destroy people. It would be no different than any other drug.
When did we stop collapsing
You’re acting like he is a normal human being bothered by the same things a normal human being is.
view more: next ›
When you’re the biggest shop in your town it’s because you do good work.
When you’re the biggest shop in the world it’s because you’re scamming your clients.