theacharnian

joined 1 year ago
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 42 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's so funny how all this is only a problem within a capitalist frame of reference.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Biden had this one chance to get back at Netanyahu for all the humiliations. The Republicans would scream murder but what else could they do to the Democrats? Win the legislature, the executive or the judiciary?

But Biden didn't. Which means he either is a glutton for punishment and has a kink for humiliation or that Netanyahu is not the one on control here and this has been Biden's genocide all along.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's mind boggling how inept the Democrats have been about shit like this. Where were the sob stories about the people whose jobs are in danger? About the brave entrepreneurs who took risks on technologies, creating jobs for the average joe just for the government to come and pick winners and losers with unfair Innovation-killing regulations? About energy security independent from foreign interference and dependencies and without letting China get the upper hand in electrification?? I mean, I don't believe in capitalism, but they're supposed to be proud self proclaimed capitalists??

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Any state department gaslighting to hasbara this?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (24 children)

Narrowing down the options to apartheid/genocide and the abolition of the Jewish character of Israel. In other words killing off the last vestiges of a non-fascist version of Zionism that a "small Israel" could allow.

So, liberal Zionists: which side are you on?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

The definition you insist on is not the only one with consequences. Arguably, in the Trump-Netanyahu era, the legal one might be the one with the least amount of consequences...

It also not the one used for the English Wikipedia. I told you to be careful with words because you were using the legal definition to argue against the scholarly one. Sticking to the legal definition doesn't make you careful per se. And I'm not sure I understand what "throwing around" is happening here. This is not the Lord's name to not be taken in vain.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pew Pew boom boom.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Be careful with the words here. The ICJ is the final decider about one specific definition of genocide. However, there is nothing that says that is the sole valid definition of genocide. In fact:

According to Ernesto Verdeja, associate professor of political science and peace studies at the University of Notre Dame, there are three ways to conceptualise genocide other than the legal definition: in academic social science, in international politics and policy, and in colloquial public usage.

  • The academic social science approach does not require proof of intent,[11] and social scientists often define genocide more broadly.[12]
  • The international politics and policy definition centres around prevention policy and intervention and may actually mean "large-scale violence against civilians" when used by governments and international organisations.
  • Lastly, Verdeja says the way the general public colloquially uses "genocide" is usually "as a stand-in term for the greatest evils".[11] This is supported by political scientist Kurt Mundorff who highlights how to the general public genocide is "simply mass murder carried out on a grand scale".[13]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_definitions

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Do those cartels want Bukele? Because this is how they get Bukele.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Isn't this kind of shit that you guys have the 2nd amendment for?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Also, it bears mentioning that this would place minors at the hands of the "Jewish Power"-controlled National Security ministry, an extremist kahanist group headed by a convicted terrorist-supporter, and of whose many members belonged formerly to a banned terrorist and racist group.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

I think this law is about "convicted" kids, as opposed to "just" administrative detention.

123
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
 

Hezbollah issued an evacuation order yesterday evening for Israeli settlers in 25 northern settlements, mirroring the occupation forces’ actions in Lebanon. The move follows widespread Israeli evacuation orders targeting areas including Beirut’s Southern Suburb, Southern Lebanon, the Bekaa, and parts of Tyre, with claims of Hezbollah military presence in civilian homes.

Hezbollah stated that the settlements had become military outposts for Israeli forces attacking Lebanon, making them “legitimate military targets” for its air and missile forces. Settlers were told to “evacuate immediately,” as their settlements had become bases for the enemy military. A video issued by Hezbollah’s Military Media reiterated this warning.

 

ANKARA, Oct 23 (Reuters) - Turkey said on Wednesday that a deadly attack was carried out at the headquarters of Turkish Aerospace Industries (TUSAS) near Ankara, while media reported a loud explosion at the site and showed footage of an exchange of gunfire there. "A terrorist attack was carried out against the TUSAS facilities in Kahramankazan, Ankara. Unfortunately, we have martyrs and injured people," Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said on social media X.

 

Taking away people's family doctors: How to make sure you lose the next election.

 

“The Israeli prime minister came here today and said that Israel is surrounded by those who want to destroy it,” Safadi said at a Friday press conference shortly after Netanyahu finished his speech at the UN General Assembly.

“We’re here — members of the Muslim-Arab committee, mandated by 57 Arab and Muslim countries — and I can tell you very unequivocally, all of us are willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state,” Safadi passionately argued.

Netanyahu “is creating that danger because he simply does not want the two-state solution. If he does not want the two-state solution, can you ask Israeli officials what is their end-game — other than just wars and wars and wars?”

Also, video of the statement.

 

TFW you support Israel so much that you start treating Palestinian children just like they do.

 

Turns out Abbé Pierre was a creep... This is like learning Mohter Theresa was a sexual predator.

14
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net
 

Discussions about scarcity and anarchism that I've seen online seem to always talk about "scarcity in the large", i.e. how does an anarchist society allocate production, food, labour, materials etc.

I've a question about anarchism and scarcity in the small. Say, a really nice location, eg. a breezy location in a very hot climate, or the room with the nice windows in the community centre, or Bag End at the top of the hill. Say, an anarchist community has decided to use the location for purpose X, but a minority wants to use it for purpose Y. Maybe an even smaller minority wants to do Z, and a bunch of other people have their own little ideas about how to use it. Some are transient and could be accommodated (you get it on Tuesdays 5-7) but others might not be ("our sculpture project needs to dry out in that specific spot for the next 4 months, we know it blocks the view but it's the only place the breeze hits just right!") or could be contradictory (the siesta people vs the loud backgammon players can't both use the spot at high noon) or antagonistic (the teenagers who want to party late vs the new parents who need quiet for the babies). And dis-association doesn't really help here because that's the nice spot for many kilometers around or there is literally no way to create another beach for our small island community because that's literally the only place on the island where sand exists, so we can't just off and leave. (* Many of these examples are imagining a hot summer in an anarchist Greece, sorry it's almost August.)

It looks to me like a simple non-life-and-death scenario like this could potentially completely poison and destroy a community and in the face of that it would be the little death of anti-authoritarian organizing. Like yea, when life and death matters are at hand, anarchists will band together and conquer the bread. But petty small-scale little shit where it's managing annoyances and small grievances, I don't think non-authoritarian decision making can solve. And I suspect it's crap like this that has killed off many intentional communities and experiments or made them veer away from non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian organizing.

Have anarchist thinkers seriously thought of this?

view more: next ›