the_stormcrow

joined 1 year ago
[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

It's hopeless my dude. Lemmy is filled with either wannabe revolutionaries or establishment toadies. There's no healthy scepticism to be found yet.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago

What does "quietly" even mean? Didn't take out ads in Times Square?

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Clearly it's the dude riding that pussy

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Multiple things can be bad at the same time. It is also possible to fight without being barbaric.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now apply this same reasoning to other life concepts we've been told, and welcome to enlightenment.

(Or black pilling, YMMV)

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Which makes no sense. How are the words picked? Is there a sliding scale, or an objectionable meter somewhere? Who decided that b!tch should be censored, but not cunt or skank?

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

This is only a good argument if the conduct regulated by the law is bad in and of itself.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the link. All the down voted I'm getting suggest people think I am defending him, but I am just being a realist.

The link shows he acknowledged the US presidency moved on without him. However, he still maintains it was rigged.

That's the rub, and that's what the prosecutor has to show - Trump either knew or recklessly disregarded that the election was not rigged, and thus all his crazy actions were in bad faith.

Can the prosecutor prove that in court? Quite possibly. Is it the slam dunk that everyone in this thread seems to be celebrating? No.

[–] the_stormcrow@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you link me where he said he knew he lost in a valid election? I haven't seen that yet. Thanks!

view more: next ›