swlabr

joined 2 years ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

gilding the lily a bit but

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago

Does a sealion have bootlicker nature? Ugh.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please, señor software engineer was my father. Call me Bob.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago

"I'm going to double down on not reading this article herpa derpa gerpa poop" that's you. Please fuck off

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

FWIW, I read this somewhat charitably: I didn't read this article as "I want there to be prediction markets in journalism" as much as "The right-wing fuckos are very into this shit, so expect for it to froth up out of the sewers in 2025." That being said, as discussed elsewhere, many of the finer points are questionable.

N.B: I am not aware of Lorenz's shit opinions.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 28 points 1 week ago

Techbros: “I’m hungry for that Lab Grown Meat!”

Labs:

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's probably worth 14B in the way a fire that you feed 14B of cash into is worth 14B

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh yeah, haha. I often face the dilemma dilemma in which I have to choose between ignoring the 'incorrect" usage (i.e. not a choice between two things that are difficult to choose between) and seethe OR mention the correct usage and look like a pedant. Sometimes it's a trilemma, and I'm all over the shop. But more seriously, I usually let it slide and let people use it to mean "a situation".

I doubt that Lorenz has a dilemma in line with the correct usage. I couldn't fight the urge to steelman, spoilered below, which I suspect this is nothing near what Lorenz had in mind.

exhausting Steelman within. I only tried to come up with something, it's not a good steelman. I'm so sorry about this.In the world that Lorenz posits, where prediction markets somehow represent accurate news reporting, either a journalist participates in the market whilst reporting news (conflict of interest), or they don't, and they are bad at their job (and not performing at your job is unethical, I guess?)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

sorry, what exactly is the dilemma here? how is it an ethical dilemma to have an unethical way to make money?

I'm guessing what's being said is that in this fictional scenario with an ethically neutral prediction market, you could do insider trading but with fake news? Like, you predict that they will find cheese on the moon, and then you make a story about cheese on the moon.

Either way, it is a moot point since prediction markets are bunk, ethically or otherwise.

 

original link

“If all of this sounds like a libertarian fever dream, I hear you. But as these markets rise, legacy media will continue to slide into irrelevance.”

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 week ago

Nah my neighbour, Steve Tesla. He’s real smart. Found a way to get free cable

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

This is great. The “diaspora” framing makes me want there to be an NPR style public interest story about all this. The emotional core would be about trying to find a place to belong and being betrayed by the people you thought could be your friends, or something.

 

Didn’t see this news posted but please link previous correspondence if I missed it.

https://archive.is/XwbY0

 

Kind of sharing this because the headline is a little sensationalist and makes it sound like MS is hard right (they are, but not like this) and anti-EU.

I mean, they probably are! Especially if it means MS is barred from monopolies and vertical integration.

view more: next ›