rwhitisissle

joined 5 months ago
[–] rwhitisissle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

That article is straight dog shit. The author is basically saying that Ted Kaczynski is the stylistic precursor to a particular brand of white nationalist terrorism because he 1) killed people and 2) had a manifesto. That's it. The article even states:

Effectively, Tarrant followed Kaczynski’s eco-terrorism but reinterpreted it to employ white supremacy and Islamophobia.

Brenton Tarrant was the Christ Church Shooter. He hated non-whites and Muslims. Saying he "followed [Kaczynski's] eco-terrorism but reinterpreted it to employ white supremacy" is, at best, misleading, and at worst a bald-faced lie. Tarrant had virtually no ideological connection with Kaczynski. He described himself as an eco-facsist because he was a dimwitted 4chan kid who blamed overpopulation on Muslims. For all of his flaws, Kaczynski was an incredibly intelligent and well-educated anarchist and would have despised Tarrant. He didn't "reinterpret ecoterrorism as white nationalism." He just labeled himself something he thought sounded cool without understanding it.

[–] rwhitisissle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

maybe the author is also a white supremacist.

What does white supremacism have to do with Ted Kaczynski?

[–] rwhitisissle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

I think I initially read that on a Vox article, but I looked again today and it looks like I must have read that somewhere else. They're also saying that's not the case and that there were false reports going around about that. I guess the rumor mill got me this time. Which is good, because no one deserves to be fired for talking openly about sex.

[–] rwhitisissle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe it's supposed to imply that boyfriend is an attribute of the particular girl. Like saying she isn't someone's boyfriend. It's probably a holdover from the original data architecture and nobody ever bothered to modify the table later on in case there's a select somewhere that expects that field to exist.

[–] rwhitisissle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

on holy disaster

unholy