rrrurboatlibad

joined 1 year ago
[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 5 points 1 week ago

ChildIDFile. Creates a secure file of your kid's information that lives only on your personal device but can be shared with police quickly. Hopefully you never need it

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I have washed shoes on gentle before with success. Technique, I put them in a pillowcase that closes first to keep laces from tangling

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 13 points 3 months ago

Meh, it works for me. I like it here more than reddit. Sorry that you haven't found your groove. It toom me a while of finding the right things to subscribe and right folks to follow before my feed felt fun and interesting. I use Lemmy as a jumping off point for rabbit holes that are interesting to me

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 16 points 5 months ago

This is a truly amazing post. Really inspired writing. Thank you for making me actually lol and forcing my wife to listen to me read it out loud

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 11 points 5 months ago

Love this game. Its such a good experience

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 4 points 5 months ago

Absolutely. Loved the first one

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 10 points 6 months ago
[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 131 points 7 months ago (8 children)

You should still set airplane mode when airborne for other reasons besides interference with the aircraft. For one, you'll save your battery. It takes a lot of "juice" for your device to search for cell towers that are likely out of reach. You may also want to avoid connecting to a tower outside where you have coverage. E.g. for a flight from Anchorage to Minneapolis, maybe you don't want to connect to Canadian cell towers and potentially receive charges in another country. Obviously this depends on your plan limits. But, yeah, it's not really about protecting the airplane, in most cases

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This reply is meant to generate discussion. It is not sarcasm or meant to be taken negatively at all:

What is the purpose of any rules? Why have them? Is it possible to make a "perfect" rule or policy or public intervention whereby all affected persons are serviced fairly? Probably not. If you conclude we need rules, how do we balance their benefits with the disenfranchisement of some of the persons affected negatively?

In your specific case, how do you make the rules minimize negative outcomes without excessively sacrificing the potential positive outcomes?

I'm genuinely interested in your perspective from your age and place in time.

These are good and valid questions. If you're passionate about them, you may consider studying political science and/or law in the future. One day, if you're still passionate about this topic, you may be in a position to change the rules.

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 25 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Seems like a softball question. Answer="Slavery". Boom, home run. More voters gained than lost

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 1 points 9 months ago

I had to "break up" with my best friend over this stuff. His could not let go of his "but both sides" crap. It sucks, but it had to be done. Maybe we'll get back together as friends one day, hopefully

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 2 points 9 months ago

Sorry, I missed the scummy part. I'll check it out

 

8 years ago a grandma accidentally texted a young man she didn't know about Thanksgiving. They've gone from strangers to family to business partners

 

F15E on a nice day

view more: next ›