peanuts4life

joined 1 year ago
[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I use Lemmy because it appeals to my wish to be alone, by myself, with no one here beside me ❤️ social media peace at last.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago

I've been using duck duck go for months now. It's totally cromulent in my opinion!

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't realize that it sold so well! That's good to hear it is successful. I'm not over the moon with the game, but I did get 30 hours or so out of it, and don't think it's bad at all. My biggest annoyance was that it felt too similar to AOE 2, which I saw as the superior game at launch. Still, that's a bit of bias from an old gamer, lol. I think it's fun!

Definitely! Just to clarify, I think that good RTS games make good esports, but fundamentally on the basis is being carefully made, captivating, and nuanced. I think an overt focus on developing an RTS as a esport tends to lead to low risk, streamlined designs which while fun, lack some of the staying power that older, more established titles have. Perhaps, I'm disillusioned about the genre in general, and that's not the case!

Also, yeah 3d can be good, but I do think that Sprite based graphics are easy to parse and very pleasing to look at. I wish we had a healthy balance of the 2. 2d also tends to look more, evergreen, with 3d RTS looking dated on release due to the quantity of animated units. Though, strong art design would help offset this.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (21 children)

I disagree with this premise. I think games like age of empires and StarCraft had mass appeal and success. They brought in audiences who don't normally like games, and broadly were well received by young, old, and different genders. Especially age of empires 2.

Modern RTS games are just (mostly) sloppy, unfinished, cashgrabs with no vision. They suffer the most from the transition to 3d as well. If a major studio actually put work and time into a polished, 2d, isometric, RTS that wasn't solely focused on being an esport, I think there is a major vacuum for them to fill.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Man, if I was personally responsible for laying off 1500 people, I'd flush myself down a toilet. People like this guy are just shit.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Mario vs Rabbits is a surprisingly fun turn based tactics game. It's something different gameplay wise from much of the switch library.

I saw someone mention Mario Odyssey. I hadn't owned a Mario game since Mario 64, but I thought it was incredible! It's just fun as all heck, and the surreal tone of the game kept me entertained. It has a bizarre mashup of "realistic" styles with the Mario universe. There isn't co-op exactly, but one person can play as the hat, helping out. Just, don't count it out because you aren't hyped about Mario. It's a quality game, and stands on its own merits.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago

Ugh... I'm deep on the ai sphere, and this seems like a bad idea to me. Gpt (let's face it, they are probably using open ai) can be deeply biased and arbitrary in it's evaluations.

For example, "Two apples and four oranges," might score better than: "4 oranges and 2 apples." for inscrutable reasons. Say, if the question spelled out the numbers, and the LLM has a weighted bias to favor overall textual consistently, it might produces a reason to dock points apparently unrelated to that weight, such as: "incomplete sentence." for the second answer, but not the first.

Students may also receive lower scores due to cultural biases towards certain phrases, and factors as straightforward as their name.

Finally, AI will hallucinate errors constantly if you ask it to evaluate text without any errors. Constantly. Consistently.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, be careful. These llms can be honeypots for data. Like, if you're using it for cover letters, or work, you're sending tons of personal info to random websites.

I would recommend sticking to actual, reputable vendors for llms, or running your own. I have a GTX 1070 and can run some pretty decent models these days locally using koboldai.

Bing is probably the only way to use gpt 4 without paying for it, and Microsoft probably won't steal your bank account info.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There is almost no chance that it is truthfully based on gpt 4. If you want a free, open source llm with 32k context and generous limits, I recommend using huggingface.co/chat/

The nous-hermes model (you can select different models) is uncensored, and performs really well for a open source model. Plus, they have data controls so you can turn off data gathering per model. Huggingface is a reputable vendor, and doesn't claim to be something it isn't.

view more: next ›