nsrxn

joined 1 week ago
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

under communism, there is no exploitation

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

so there is no one "at the top" "exploiting people at the bottom"

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 16 hours ago (26 children)

Whatever “ism” you use, there will always be people at the top who are exploiting people at the bottom.

communism is classless. there is no top or bottom. same with anarchism.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this hasn't been a conversation for hours

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought if you had read it this might be a worthwhile conversation.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I wanted to see if it was worth continuing this conversation

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I'm confident it is propaganda, but not having seen it, I don't know what politics it is pushing.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (7 children)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

not having seen it, I obviously can't tell you what is messages are.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have no interest though. do you have a point?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

have you read Foucault?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I'm not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I've seen in months.

view more: ‹ prev next ›