michaelgemar

joined 2 years ago
[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 3 points 1 year ago
[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 2 points 1 year ago

@ulkesh @startrek It’s a terrific series, and Wheaton is such a great host.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@mycatiskai @startrek I’ve always been uncomfortable with how much Star Wars fandom has embraced the iconography of the Empire.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 1 points 1 year ago

@phoenixz @startrek IMHO, Strange New Worlds is the most “Star Trek” show since TNG. It really captures the spirit of the original show.

(I am not a fan of Picard or Discovery, largely because I feel they don’t have the elements I liked about past shows — they are too dark and pessimistic for my tastes.)

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Doug @startrek That scene was pure fan service, and after a decade in the wilderness this fan at least *loved* it.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 1 points 1 year ago

@Uranium3006 @startrek Arguably the original vision was far less sexist, with a female second in command (which the network quashed). Even having a female as part of the bridge crew was ahead of its time.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 3 points 1 year ago

@HeartyBeast @startrek *Please* can we forget them?

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@StillPaisleyCat @startrek Of *course* their programming language would require a special keyboard.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 4 points 1 year ago

@ZenkorSoraz To paraphrase a developer from the ‘80s: “I don't know what the language of the future will look like, but I know it will be called Fortran.”

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@MaxMouseOCX @startrek That’s not the criterion for the Bechdel Test — it’s ONE conversation between two women that’s not about a man.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

@Blamemeta TOS, and Roddenberry’s original vision, was all about diversity/inclusivity.

view more: ‹ prev next ›