mathemachristian

Sternenko is a violent neonazi. Please don't donate.

what a ~~cute~~ little nazi

What a nice guy

https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-sternenko-prison-release-/31283650.html

Also the founder of the odessan chapter of right sector lest we forget

https://www.dw.com/en/the-odessa-file-what-happened-on-may-2-2014/a-18425200

Its fine for a scientific paper, expected even, but this is meant to be an article for the non-experts.

The trick here seems to be then joining those paths for a collection of subgraphs?

ooh I do love me some graph theory so I am going to look more into this thanks!

the group has generated routes called Hamiltonian cycles

i only know this term which is simply a cycle going through all nodes, so Im going to assume there is a much easier way to explain what they achieved but the journalists are trying to be obtuse in order to sound smart.

our anti-crime precautions
their high-tech surveillance

If he relly believes democracy is at stake there is only one course of action left

I postulate that there comes a point where language is required to achieve a higher state of emotion.

Ah finally! A justification to eat my own child! Thank you kind stranger!

Look at all those people in that thread going "I dont know if animals have the same emotions or just similar ones" or "we can't prove that plants dont feel pain too!" and then splitting hairs in the most asinine pseudophilisophical debates, just so they dont have to engage with the core of the issue, that what they're doing is fucked up.

They know it, deep down, as did I before I went vegan, but it's eye-opening to see it "from the other side".

Try something material. Something that has an effect in your material context.

attack on identity

Another debate term. I'm not arguing with you. I don't care about the truth value of that statement since it's irrelevant to the point that I wanted to make. Please stop seeing every conversation through the lense of which fallacy can be applied. Not everything is a debate.

You'll see it's a much more freeing and fun way to interact with people, I promise.

On second thought youre probably really young in which case I want to apologise. You're right that I neither argued for the claim in the link nor against your claim, I don't care about either of them since their irrelevant to the main point. Word of advice though, these kind of "fallacy debates" about irrelevant details are not productive I have never witnessed someone being swayed by it. Find something you actually care about then argue about that. Argue why you care for it, people are much more convinced by emotion than some stylized formal argument.