howrar

It's not pointless. Depending on where you live, there's a good chance you do have an abundance of cheap housing available. They're just not in desirable locations, so many would opt to either pay extra for the privilege of living in more desirable homes or even living on the streets.

Regarding taxes, I'm talking about those who haven't previously paid taxes, are not currently paying taxes while living in the area, and have no plans to pay taxes after they leave the area.

How did that work when it came to deciding who gets the more desirable housing versus the less desirable ones? Or those who are not from the area and don't pay taxes to cover the housing?

Normally, portioning out the ingredients would be the first step of the process and is all done at once.

I've always interpreted it as being equivalent to "what's done is done"

Valid opinion on the phrasing. Disagree with the premise that anything someone says is necessarily their opinion.

Example: "For me, potatoes are easier to peel with a knife than a potato peeler" vs "Potatoes are easier to peel with a knife than a potato peeler". The former says that this is my experience and yours may differ. The latter says that this is true in general and if you find it easier the other way, there's a good chance you're doing something wrong.

I'm pretty sure you mean that you'd like a world with no landlords and not a world where short term housing solutions don't exist. No rent would imply the latter. Unless you know of a way to do it without paying rent?

And she's only getting half of the controls with no coordination between the two. She doesn't know how strong of a stream you're giving her and you can't adjust it based on where she plans to point your dick.

Logical meaning having the ability to follow logical rules to determine whether or not any statement is true or false. I've followed that train of logic and determined that the sentence you provided is neither true nor false. I've determined that it is paradoxical. Why would an omniscient being be unable to know that this is a paradox?

This sentence is not known to be true by any omniscient being.

I don't understand how this disproves the existence of an omniscient being. What if I said "This sentence is not known to be true by any logical being." Is my existence disproven now?

Is this the internet equivalent of laugh tracks to inform us that your comment is funny?

Could you process it further and package it up to sell as salt? Or is this not the same thing as table salt?

I've never found Bing chat to match up with the free ChatGPT. It often just refuses to answer my question while ChatGPT will at least take a guess and give me something to work with.