The EU just looked into the potential for dumping. They were not finished with the process and therefore did not punish CRRC at all.
What's your point here? There are actual quotes in the article claiming the pull-out as a result of the regulation, meaning they didn't pull out because they wanted to.
Also China is not that poor. GDP per capita is only a third less then that of Romania.
But both are "up-and-coming" as I said alongside "poorer" so I'm not sure why you're arguing semantics here. China is one of very few exceptions when it comes to actively losing money to richer countries (Net Resource Transfers). This regulation is not about China, it targets any foreign company, and if you understood my post, you'd know that the vast majority of them are being drained and in need of economic help.
You're basically making the "I have black friends so I can't be racist" argument. Your post history is like 90% articles like these:
Like, this is not a normal amount of articles about China. This feels like an obsession. If I was posting a similar amount of pro-China articles, I'd rightfully be called a shill.