But it seems you are too ideologically blinded to engage with normal scientific arguments :(
Lets not resort to making assumptions about one another or accusing each other of being ideologically blinded. That line of ad-hominem argumentation leads no where productive. I'm arguing the material you linked and citing evidence.
You think using VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) to talk about vaccine adverse events is misinformation, and I disagree.
I see big pharma, fined billions of dollars for literally lying about product safety to make profit.
I see corporate sponsored gov that lied us into Iraq war, Afghanistan war, denies us universal healthcare and education, has record numbers in prisons and homeless. Conducts covert actions to destabilize democratically elected govs they don't like
I see this big pharma, big gov and big tech unite to force their product into ppl, a process that can not be reversed, under threat of not being able to work or eat in a restaurant unless you comply.
I see censorship of doctors, one who even has patents regarding the mRNA tech.
I see denial of early treatment. Hospitals sending ppl home until symptoms worsen.
Only signal we have for problems with vaccines, VAERS, is going off the charts.
You want to ignore all that? Fine, your choice. I see a big problem here and I'm just stating my opinion. I won't assume anything about your character or attack you personally. I don't see the value in treating ppl that way.
I'm fine having a disagreement with someone else and don't take it too personally.