clausetrophobic

joined 1 year ago
[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can play it by yourself! It's 3 missions in a row that are slightly different each time. You can play it coop or singleplayer.

The demo for HW3 is out!

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

How dare you raise that abomination of "coffee" to this honourable Australian's name.

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because a world where people are firing guns at each other all the time is INSANE, regardless of the context. Most of the developed world has figured this out.

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

For the rest of the country, it would be Quebec

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

Fuck off with the big pharma apologetics.

Boo hoo the corporation got millions in taxpayer money to develop a vaccine and now they have to profit off of it. I feel so bad for them.

This is subtle astroturfing.

Prejudice is fine as long as you can logically moralise it in your head right

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you mean "nothing to do with"? The title literally says "the opposite of planned obsolescence", which is planning the failure of a device. This is showing the planned continued use of a device when parts of it fails.

Russia invading Ukraine is bad for the entirety of Europe and the western world, it's not just "US interests".

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Normalisation in culture has effects on how people behave in the real world. Look at Japan's sexualization of women and minors, and how they have huge problems with sexual assault. It's not about whether or not real children are getting hurt, it's about whether it's morally right or wrong. And as a society, we've decided that CP is very wrong as a moral concept.

They had that before but it kept getting vandalized

 

What's unique about Lemmy is that we get to actually see the number of accounts and members, unfiltered. Do we have any comparable numbers from mainstream social media that can give us a baseline from what is a normal amount of not accounts being created, what is more than normal and what is less than average. I'm assuming that all social networks face this problem, we just don't usually get to see the numbers so dryly.

view more: next ›