blandfordforever

joined 9 months ago
[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The time capsule also contains a copy of his book, "Swedish made penis enlarger pumps and me. Yes, this sort of thing is my bag, baby"

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't be ridiculous. He has a lawnmower in one hand and a chainsaw in the other.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

"do not push this red button"

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago

The technologically illiterate pirate is an easy target.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago

Especially if there were weaker intermolecular forces (which normally give it surface tension).

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hold shift while you click start and shutdown (or reboot) when necessary. This will have windows do a full shutdown instead of a hybrid shutdown.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Greg must be a very patient man because Lauren seems exhausting.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

The implication that other waters may not be fart free has scarred me forever.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm still not understanding the part where everyone having an extra 25k for a house purchase doesn't just increase the price of all houses by 25k. This is what happens when you increase the demand for something without increasing the supply.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Pirating their content doesn't afford you legal protections but agreeing to their license agreements could definitely turn out to have been a big mistake.

If you're just itching for that content, pick your poison.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

My friend, in california, every house costs a million dollars. All this is going to do is bump up the value of a house by 2.5% at the expense of taxpayers. Unless we're going to massively increase tax on the rich and cut tax for the poor, I don't see this as a win.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Maybe I'm missing somethng here. I'm not just asking this because I'm upset about the possibility of other people getting money and not me: Wouldn't we expect the home buyers' subsidy to only increase demand and drive up the cost of houses? Then the money would end up in the hands of those who already own one or many houses. Isn't this just giving money to people who are already well-off? Wouldn't it be better to create a program focused on building more houses instead?

view more: ‹ prev next ›