You must really know what you're talking about huh
betwixthewires
joined 1 year ago
Gender isn't objective, and so people who disagree cannot be objectively wrong. That is an objective fact.
But this isn't am age limit, its using an age limit as a hack to basically grandfather in a smoking ban. It is about finding the right approach, and this ain't it.
The show ends early, but until the final season, very very closely. I won't spoil it but towards the end production of the show ran into some problems due to some ill advised behaviors by one of the actors, and then they kind of just tell you what happened in the book and rush through the shows ending, they covered like half a book in the final episode, the usual shitshow when a show dies prematurely.
The books don't end when the show does. The show is still worth watching, 100%, but I think if it had ended when syfy dropped it it would've ended on a high note.
Are they including kiwi's extensions support? I know Bromite and others would not maintain it.
You guys both need to stop eating garbage and start cooking your own food. It's cheaper, it's fun and you get to eat something that isn't made of garbage.
Except I think the dude actually likes it.
It won't hurt anybody because neither side can afford a spoiler and they know it. The only people voting for him are going to be millionaire and billionaire tech bros.
Population decline due to low birth rates has never happened. Population declines have always been due to disease or war or something like that, taking the adults and leaving a young population behind. It's not about a system, an aging population with low birth rates probably amounts to population collapse, but we are in uncharted territory and can't know for sure how it plays out.
The militias are a protection for a free state, just as it says. Not "the government" but a set of institutions that are built by the people, that work to preserve their liberty, that exist only so long as they continue that mission in good faith. "The government" may or may not be a part of that equation, many would argue, including people that are on your side of the spectrum politically, that the government no longer represents the people or protects their freedom at all, so protecting them would not serve the goal of preserving a free state.