bayaz

joined 1 year ago
[–] bayaz@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

@Fiivemacs

Uh... thanks, I guess. But, that doesn't really have anything to do with what I posted as far as I can tell. My post was mainly about spam. I love the Fediverse as much as the next person, but spammers gonna spam, and we'll have to fight them regardless of the platform.

1
Meta post: (kbin.social)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by bayaz@kbin.social to c/food@kbin.social
 

Meta post:

Hey, microblog folks! I'm the current owner of this magazine. I recently noticed that there has been a fair amount of spam on the microblog side recently. First off, I want to apologize for that. Second, I want to give a few explanations:

  • I mainly read threads (I know, that isn't a great excuse, but see my link later)
  • I only recently realized that kbin filtered out 18+ posts by default, so any spam posts that marked themselves as NSFW were invisible to me
  • There have been no unresolved user reports of spam for quite a while

So, I'm asking for your help in two ways to keep the magazine spam-free:
(1) Please report spam as you see it. I know it gets tiresome, especially as kbin.social in general has been overrun recently, but I do check those reports regularly, and I will delete any spam that you report.
(2) If there is anyone who wants to be a moderator, please see this previous thread: invitation to moderate . Basically, if you are an active kbin user who shows interest, I will gladly add you as mod.

I will check the microblog more actively from now on to delete spam, but both of the above would be a big help to me in keeping the magazine (both threads and microblog) spam-free.

Overall, this community has been very straightforward to moderate -- no hate speech, flame wars, etc. Thank you all for that, and thanks for keeping this community active and vibrant!

#food

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

@insomniac_lemon It ended up being super simple -- my profile was hiding the 18+ posts by default. All I had to do was uncheck a box, and everything appeared again. Kind of a clever way by the spammers of getting around some moderation if it was intentional. It sounds like the kbin devs might consider changing the defaults on that for moderators to avoid this in the future.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The issue has been reported: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/1377

Let me know (or post there directly) if I missed or misstated anything.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Looking at the modlog, the ones you removed were posts (microblogs). Relevant to the issue?

Nice catch!

With your direct links, I was able to see those threads. I attempted to delete two of them, and the modlog shows that I was successful. I've left the third for now as evidence for any developers who care to look.

Regarding "unban", I'm hoping that's just a bug in how things are printed. The ban does show up in the moderation log.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Okay, thanks for your patience. I think we've hit the limit of what we can do at this point.

Nothing changed with your downvotes or comments. Going through kbin.social/u/{user}, I was able to view and delete PellyNews's threads. I am unable to do anything with the other two users. Even though I can see they exist, the relevant threads do not show up for me under their profiles.

I'll file the issue and keep just deleting what I can until things are sorted out on the backend. Thanks again for your help on this.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Using those usernames/profiles to look at the posts directly, I don't suppose there is anything that might detail what is going on?

Can you get me the full usernames including domains (e.g., PellyNews@blah.blah)? More info couldn't hurt when compiling the issue report.

The only thing I can think of is that maybe you are somehow "subscribed" to other domains because you follow some magazine/community there, and I am not, so the posts don't show up for me. That doesn't really make sense, but neither does anything else.

I did do a little searching for terms like "delete", "cache", and even "different", and didn't see this exact issue anywhere. The closest I found was this: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/875 . It doesn't seem like a federation issue, though, since we are on the same instance. But, if you wanted to experiment further, you could try either downvoting or commenting on the spam to see whether that makes it visible to me.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

Ouch, what a bug. I knew some of the moderation wasn't being federated, but I can't imagine how a kbin user isn't seeing the latest version.

To be clear, you see the spam when logged in, then don't see it logged out, then see it again when logged in again?

I don't see it regardless of whether I'm logged in or not. Also, I don't think I've ever been able to see it because I don't see the posts in a quick look through the moderation log.

Would you mind posting an issue about this? https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues Or, I can do it if you don't feel like it and don't mind me using your screenshots. If you do post it, just please emphasize that this makes it impossible for moderation to happen because the moderator literally cannot see the posts.

Thanks again for trying things out and sharing your info!

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (11 children)

EDIT: I should have started with "thanks", by the way. I appreciate the response.

This is so weird. I don't see any of those first four posts. I see the fifth (I'm actually the downvote), and I agree it's sketchy, but I'm trying to get just the absolute worst out for now.

Also, I have two posts you don't have. I'm viewing this directly in Firefox -- are you in an app of some kind?

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (13 children)

@shazbot @insomniac_lemon To be clear, you're talking about /m/food on kbin.social? And particularly the threads side?

I'm the mod for that community, and I'm not seeing any amazon links, gummies, etc. I'm usually pretty good about deleting those within at most 24 hours of them being posted. But, if you're still seeing them, either there's a glitch or I'm doing something wrong.

Right now, I'm seeing 51 threads total, and the newest one is a month old (tagliatelle link). Are you seeing something different?

I agree with you about the questionable food blogs and probably-ai-generated content. I've been on the fence about whether to delete those, but I decided to let it slide and hope that upvotes/downvotes would take care of it. Also, I didn't get any user reports about them, so that was another metric to consider. For now, I'm just doing the absolute minimum of deleting obvious drug spam and amazon links (or, at least, I thought I was). If you notice anything especially egregious (where on earth do you see this 18+ spam nonsense?!) and could take the time to report it, I would really appreciate it.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FYI, I tried the process you mentioned, I'm not sure it's as simple as your post implies (if that process could be called "simple" anyway). I've tried a few different orders of "report, delete, ban", and clicked the "ban" button in at least two spots (one that was directly in the feed and another that comes up under Reports in the magazine panel). No matter what I do, it always shows up as "unban" in the mod log. However, there is a list of bans under the magazine panel, and that does show the accounts as banned.

So, I'm really not sure what is going on here. Maybe it's just a problem with the log and not with the banning itself?

Anyway, thanks again for pointing this out. Hopefully someone can figure out what is going on.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What the... ugh. I've been doing this for months. Thanks for letting me know.

 

I looking for a person or a few people who want to take over as mod(s) of this magazine. I don't read kbin as often any more, and I mainly read threads, whereas this is primarily a microblog magazine.

It really isn't much work right now. All I do is log on once a day or so to check for blatantly obvious spam on the threads side. People seem to have figured out that the sub is at least lightly moderated, and I think I've needed to remove less than one thread a week lately. I've never had any reports of issues besides spam.

The only things I am looking for are the following:

  • you are a kbin.social user (because this is a kbin-hosted magazine)
  • you have a few posts in any magazine in the last few months just so that I know you are not a spambot

I'll probably just add the first few people who reply who meet those criteria.

[–] bayaz@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I recently started studying for the Technician exam -- excited to see I made a good choice!

 

You could replace "car accident" with pretty much any non-smoking-related cause of death, but car accident is one of the most likely (in the USA) and sounded the weirdest when it occurred to me.

 
 

Quick question about Makefiles: is there any reason to put recipe lines inside parens? I'm not asking about variable expansion -- I mean an entire line. For example, see SuiteSparse: https://github.com/DrTimothyAldenDavis/SuiteSparse/blob/dev/Makefile

Normally, you would use parens to make sure you don't mess with your state, but each line of a recipe in GNU Make is effectively run in its own environment anyway.

I've seen it a few places now, so just wondering whether it is simply stylistic preference or if there is some effect I'm missing.

EDIT: Okay, did find one case where it could matter, although it doesn't apply in SuiteSparse. If you use the .ONESHELL special target, then all lines of your recipes run in a single shell, rather than each getting their own shell. In that case, if you wanted to get back something like the original new-shell-per-line behavior, you could wrap lines in parens as described above. TIL.

#programming

 
view more: next ›