Sounds like a step in the right direction
Anyone following the european comission and can recommend how to stay up to date the best here?
Sounds like a step in the right direction
Anyone following the european comission and can recommend how to stay up to date the best here?
We really need forestland to bind C-atoms from the Co2 in our air. That would be the most heroic approach. Also wholesome since it creates habitat.
forest management resulting in slow money
Thanks for the info and phasing it with nuance!!
Anything else would be in danger of falling into the "Nirvana fallacy" category
Depression resistance +1000
The good old 360 days of quickly opening the message menu to flame someone ingame ,but then taking 20 years to type out all the letters
Oh wow, theres more to this discussion, nicely useful!
says:
evaluate on case-by-case basis
So its kind of in a grey zone, not reliable doesnt mean bad source in that case. Useful link, altough wikipedia is also a grey zone in the sense that its information based on open source (everybody can edit it, and most liked proposals get through as I understand)
Thanks for the confirmation
Well what ground news wants to do -critical evaluation and media literacy- is so vital.
But ground news deciding on what exact position on the spectrum a source is, seems to achieve the exact oposite: make people depentend in questioning and finding a variety of sources.
Nowadays everything needs to happen in an instant.
If theres a solution that only takes half a snap, that will be the only relevant choice for the mass. Thats why Im instantly asking, because just today I referred to this source to someone else as a might-be-bad example but instantly realized, I will have to ask this on the next situation (now)
Anyways thanks for the correction!
but I thought big corpo is there to create jobs!
I mean the article is very tragic and all. But I cant help it to think the author's sentence structure here is trying very hard to suggest the numbers were from last month. Am I the only one?