Zaktor

He needs people he can relate to.

Yes, of course, in the campaign where she ignored the left, campaigned with and for Republicans, and abandoned minority groups, the real problem was wokeness. While there's always a factional blame game after an election loss, never in history has the argument from the centrists been so detached from the actual campaign that occurred.

You need to keep reading my posts until you get it through your head that I didn't pick 5% or 1% or 0.1% because there was an estimate of increased casualties, it's just an expression of the degradation being marginal. None of the numbers mean anything. One is worse (Trump), but on this issue not by a lot, and when someone is voting emotionally because they know people who have been killed, they may not be in the head space to see a small difference as more important than their anger.

You can talk about passionless objective voters calculating death percentages all you want, but that was never the topic of conversation. I'm not in that population, I made my calculation and a little less death is worth it, but I don't blame anyone who lost a relative, watched Harris and Biden barely even give lip service to them and their community, and then told them to go fuck themselves. Haha, leopard sure ate their faces, what idiots.

"Hey, I hear an absolutely horrible and heartbreaking thing is happening, time to get in some election commentary" isn't cynicism, it's "told ya so".

I think the masses of voters who are much less easy to influence. They're not on Lemmy debating the topic or waiting for a community leader to decide the strategy. They probably didn't even do any sort of deep game theory about playing chicken and scaring the Democrats. They just got more pissed off as the news came through, as the Democrats made excuses and acted like nothing needed to change, and as people in their community reported deaths. We can debate and shout and rationalize here all we want, we can suppress the topic for the greater good, and all that will have zero impact on electorate-level perceptions. They're not here, there are too many for us to individually convince to change their mind, and they're probably not even open to listening to a coldly rational argument about lesser evils and other topics.

Even the people organizing these campaigns didn't have the influence to change their votes. Uncommitted endorsed Harris! But the whole thing was never in their control. They can only report the temperature they're feeling in the community and suggest moves they think would help get people back into the tent. Those Democratic operatives and elected officials should have the potential to influence Harris. They have names people know, and phone numbers to people of importance. If she was so corrupt and blocked off that even they couldn't reach her then we kind of do need the reckoning that could come from such an abject failure to keep the coalition together. There's no "push her to be better after the election" in that case.

That's what I did. Here's two in easy form:

Topic: "Israeli drones shooting children in Gaza deliberately 'day after day', UK surgeon tells MPs":

You know what would help this situation? Letting a fascist become President of the United States. Again.

Topic: "Continuing 'Ethnic Cleansing' Campaign, Israel Blows Past US Deadline for Gaza Aid"

Don’t worry, just like how it was only fair that Ukraine and American minorities get genocided if Gaza was going to get genocided, abstaining voters have likewise decided it’s only fair for the West Bank to suffer genocide if Gaza is going to suffer genocide.

Current genocide happening, but let's instead talk about how it's somehow going to be worse in January because the real importance is the election.

“I think it is clear that Congress has a responsibility to act. We have legal tools here. And as I said, we cannot approve the sale of arms to a country that is in violation of our own laws on this."

F15s were just the next thing to be sent.

Are fighter jets not "arms"? They were just the next arms transfer being talked about at the time.

It's not a "right" figure, it's an expression of small differences. Stop trying to do math and just read what I'm writing. 99 vs. 100, 99.9 vs. 100, really bad vs. slightly more bad, whatever expression you'd prefer. The difference in impact is limited because Biden has presented practically no restriction or resistance.

In the last day this story has been posted 4 times with heavy engagement on each post. And whenever every anything related to Israel and Gaza has a glib "told-ya-so"/"it's going to be worse in January!" comment.

I'm not counting bodies, I'm saying the relative dedication to genocide is not significantly different in impact. The material difference from Biden is literally just the 2000 lb. bombs, with an unquantifiable and unreliable hope that Democrats would snap out of it and start doing better. Hope meant it was worth trying for, because a change could be a big deal, but very likely the real difference in death come January 20th is going to be minimal compared to the death that Biden has already overseen and allowed.

A useful aspect of Lockdown mode (on top of it potentially being quick) is that you can still get into the camera without unlocking it (for me it's a double tap on the power). When you're locked down they can't navigate to your photos, but you might want to be able to record things.