https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824348/
A range of negative adverse effects have been associated with chemical castration. Like surgical castration, it initiates andropause (a male equivalent of menopause) and
may result in severe mood instability
and, in some cases, clinical depression. It may also cause weight gain, insomnia, hot flushes, diabetes, feminization, migraine headaches, and, especially in cases of long-term use, bone demineralization (Garcia and Thibaut 2011).
My condolences to the ground.
Chemical castration has been shown to make it even worse... But yeah, a LITERAL FUCKING FASCHIST GOVERNMENT being Faschist isn't that big of a stretch.
Fucking assholes at it again ruining fun because "CHILDREN CHILDREN" while they actually just want to opress.
Its gladly not that hard to get a rating, the agency just gives you a form you need to fill, hope everyone does that.
Since they now own the domain, can we DDOS it to rack up their expenses? Fuck them they don't deserve money.
Do you read the articles linked? The EPA doesn't give out the actual numbers, the numbers you use are for lightly toxic and radioactive material. The caskets will not last 200 years
encaseing isn't a option, concrete expands when drying and would crush the containers of the material, wich is just making it easier for water to get in, furthermore concrete is Corrosive and should not touch the waste containers in general.
Roman concrete is the worst example you can give, its super bad at protecting against water, and it lasts because the concrete is actually not as well made as ours, ours is better mixed and can hold way more load, theirs had faults, wich is the reason why it's still standing, water gets in, activates the hardening process again and "its fixed" its not safe to use that stuff for nuclear waste or any modern building.
And you again make a wrong call, it takes over a Million years to get most of the waste to be lead, the stable end product of uranium. The stuff isn't safe before that state, even lead is still toxic, although more manageable, anything before is extremely toxic and is radiating. Its not safe after a given period, its safe after its tested safe, not a single second before that. Radiation isn't a joke, especially prolonged exposure.
There is no material known to man (or woman) (wich we can effectively build with) that lasts 100 thousand to 1 Million years (wich is necessary for such things)
We cannot build such a building from pure gold or titanium (wich both wouldn't last long enough either, but significantly longer than concrete) a structure like that has to be rebuild at least once in 100 years, if not every 50 years, wich is more reasonable. It will cost humanity for all eternity to keep the environment safe from this waste.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concrete_degradation
Forgot to add, NO, nuclear, or rather toxic contamination of ground and surface water has the ability to be a super serious environmental issue for very very large areas. We humans produced stuff that might outlast our species, its not just nuclear waste, there is also regular toxic waste with similar storage issues wich we cannot dispose off and that has to be stored in a similar manner, just the need for radiation shielding is not there, but water and air are the biggest enemies of human architecture and long lasting storage solutions.
There is no such thing as forever lasting human buildings or burrows. They will always be a huge burden.
These so called caskets have to be rebuild regularly because the contents will remain harmful for what may as well be called eternity in human years
They will get water leaks, they will erode and they will constantly cost money and be a burden on the environment. CO2 is comparingly manageable, its a mid therm problem for humanity, nuclear waste is burden forever... Unless we shoot it into the sun or something like that. (will never be a good option)
Shit take man, environment is important and having landslides from such a storage is not good. When such a thing breaks it can do serious serious damage to people and nature alike.
Nuclear takes days to adjust safely. In a non emergency case you don't regulate it up or down, it has a static load available.
There is emergency shutdown, but the rapid slowing of the fission takes a big burden on the rods and the reactor itself, its for emergency purposes only.
The violent outbursts also get worse, the health problem are a further point, but not the main one, i sadly cannot for the sake of it find the Study i read about it a while ago, but the findings where that the chemically castrated criminals that got released replaced the sexual urge with violence and had a way higher relapse rate, with worse crimes like murder.