this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
72 points (92.9% liked)

Europe

1335 readers
332 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link

Laying out key priorities for the EU's upcoming Clean Industrial Deal, German Economy State Secretary Sven Giegold said on Monday (30 September) he wants the Commission to prioritise renewable energy, taking a tough line on nuclear power and France’s renewable targets.

Alongside a quicker roll-out of renewable energy facilitated by “further exemptions from [environmental impact] assessments,” Giegold outlined several other German priorities for the EU’s upcoming strategy.

Based on the 2030 renewable energy targets, the EU should also set up a 2040 framework, complemented by new, more ambitious targets for energy efficiency, he said.

“It should include new heating standards, a heat pump action plan and a renovation initiative,” he explained, noting a heat pump action plan was last shelved in 2023.

Hydrogen, made from renewables, should be governed by a “a pragmatic framework,” the German politician stressed, reiterating calls from his boss, Economy Minister Robert Habeck (Greens), to delay strict production rules into the late 2030s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These so called caskets have to be rebuild regularly because the contents will remain harmful for what may as well be called eternity in human years

They will get water leaks, they will erode and they will constantly cost money and be a burden on the environment. CO2 is comparingly manageable, its a mid therm problem for humanity, nuclear waste is burden forever... Unless we shoot it into the sun or something like that. (will never be a good option)

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that? Because that is not true. A properly built casket can go for at least a thousand years. The issues reported with caskets is where they've been exposed to salt water / brine. That's a facility issue, not a casket issue. There are so many caskets stored around the world and only a very small amount have had actual issues associated with them.

Even with the issues, the impact has always been very locally. Not like with coal where radioactive matter is blasted straight into the atmosphere and spread in dust form. Radioactive dust getting into your lungs is a big issue. Water contaminated with waste you can simply stay a feet away from and be perfectly fine. And remember a lot of water gets contaminated all the time with a lot of different dangerous stuff, that's why we monitor and treat the water we use. The leaks have been a problem, but mostly in the form of costs, not in the form of it being dangerous. It has always been detected right away and not gotten into water we use.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is no material known to man (or woman) (wich we can effectively build with) that lasts 100 thousand to 1 Million years (wich is necessary for such things)

We cannot build such a building from pure gold or titanium (wich both wouldn't last long enough either, but significantly longer than concrete) a structure like that has to be rebuild at least once in 100 years, if not every 50 years, wich is more reasonable. It will cost humanity for all eternity to keep the environment safe from this waste.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/christinero/2019/11/26/the-staggering-timescales-of-nuclear-waste-disposal/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concrete_degradation

Forgot to add, NO, nuclear, or rather toxic contamination of ground and surface water has the ability to be a super serious environmental issue for very very large areas. We humans produced stuff that might outlast our species, its not just nuclear waste, there is also regular toxic waste with similar storage issues wich we cannot dispose off and that has to be stored in a similar manner, just the need for radiation shielding is not there, but water and air are the biggest enemies of human architecture and long lasting storage solutions.

There is no such thing as forever lasting human buildings or burrows. They will always be a huge burden.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well those timelines aren't correct. The EPA says 10.000 years and that's for the entire storage solution. It doesn't matter that the caskets decay after a 2000 years, once the entire thing is encased in rock.

The concrete degradation doesn't really apply, because caskets are specifically made with longevity in mind and aren't just made out of concrete. Causes for concrete degradation is also exposure to water and mechanical stress. That doesn't apply in a long term storage facility.

And we still have examples of Roman concrete around these days, made 2000 years ago. There are also natural nuclear reactors which are contained, so we know in principle containment is possible.

It may take 100.000 years for something to become completely inert, but that doesn't mean it isn't safe much earlier. And something with that long of a timeline doesn't produce hardly any radiation to begin with. The dangerous stuff is much hotter and becomes safe within hundreds to thousands of years.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you read the articles linked? The EPA doesn't give out the actual numbers, the numbers you use are for lightly toxic and radioactive material. The caskets will not last 200 years

encaseing isn't a option, concrete expands when drying and would crush the containers of the material, wich is just making it easier for water to get in, furthermore concrete is Corrosive and should not touch the waste containers in general.

Roman concrete is the worst example you can give, its super bad at protecting against water, and it lasts because the concrete is actually not as well made as ours, ours is better mixed and can hold way more load, theirs had faults, wich is the reason why it's still standing, water gets in, activates the hardening process again and "its fixed" its not safe to use that stuff for nuclear waste or any modern building.

And you again make a wrong call, it takes over a Million years to get most of the waste to be lead, the stable end product of uranium. The stuff isn't safe before that state, even lead is still toxic, although more manageable, anything before is extremely toxic and is radiating. Its not safe after a given period, its safe after its tested safe, not a single second before that. Radiation isn't a joke, especially prolonged exposure.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some random Forbes article? No because what kind of source is that? I checked their sources and they were all dead.

Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_cask_storage

They have caskets that last for at least 1800 years today, with better shit to come. The whole point is to store it in a location without any water.

The timelines you state are also totally incorrect. The EPA specifically states 10.000 years in their standards.

Edit: I read the Forbes article, it's anti-nuclear propaganda without any sources.

Read this instead: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-waste/radioactive-wastes-myths-and-realities

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Unless we shoot it into the sun or something like that. (will never be a good option)

FYI: Kurzgesagt: Warum schießen wir Atommüll nicht einfach ins Weltall?