Wolfizen

joined 1 year ago
[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gottem!! Thanks for including the 2nd pic.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 4 points 3 months ago

Lovely pictures! Your base looks nice :)

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 2 points 4 months ago

Huge congratulations to the successful move away from Fandom! R.I.P. Gamepedia, that was the 2nd best era of the Wiki IMO.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think your idea is a good idea. You could keep the view distance low on the server to reduce the number of real chunks being generated. Clients can render whatever they want.

I think one issue would be when you approach a player structure from the outside, the client might see an unmodified world first and then the player structure would pop in and overwrite the client-side terrain. Its not a technical issue, but more a player experience concern.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I investigated more and it seems that one can indeed perform NAT with Linux netfilter without the Masquerade action. If one knows the address of the interface, simply using the "SNAT" action with a to-address of the outbound interface will achieve the same result as using the "MASQUERADE" action, as long as the address of the outbound interface does not change.

But, this fact only matters for the actual underlying netfilter. I should have been thinking about OP's application specifically. For OpenWRT it probably does just mean Checked->NAT, Unchecked->No NAT.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh, thank you! I think I mixed up the option with something else. I appreciate the correction!

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Everything you've said here also aligns with my knowledge!

I can add some additional information.

The Masquerade option changes how the packet rule behaves when performing in a NAT situation. When Masquerade is off, the rule is configured statically with each interface's address when the rule is loaded. When Masquerade is on, the rule is evaluated dynamically every time against each interface's current address.

If you are routing packets through an interface, and the interface's address is dynamic (which is the case for most residential internet connections), you should have Masquerade ON to be able to route packets after the interface's address changes during normal operation.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not aware of a setting that removes the app badge from all shortcuts, only the Edit option you found already.

I've also not used launchers other than Nova.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago

Thanks for sharing!

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I love the dragon head star! Thanks for sharing :)

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

When one's device is a general purpose computer instead of a locked-down feature computer, so many more excellent opportunities are available. I'm glad you are enjoying your freedom to compute what you want!

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Is this what ArchLinux uses for its AUR? it looks similar

 

free him

 
view more: next ›