Ok, but you can't actually isolate 'knowledge of addictive behaviour' into a regulatable thing without an absurd amount of government oversight i.e. examing every employees work to check they aren't using that pesky psyschology degree.
Ummdustry
joined 9 months ago
Ok, but what would be the legal precendent there? We regulate tabacco precisely because of it's psychological and medical effects, not because it's bad for your wallet. This lawsuit depends upon a claim of addiction because you can't just regulate something for annoying you.
Migrating to the EU is not no, but due process is. Having items seized (in the way the article also describes) would qualify as an abuse of power.
It's eye witness testimony (according to article) so technically good journalistic practice to quote rather than state. Elsewhere it talks about beatings, for which the journalists could see the wounds, so no quotations are used. If the i had evidence of gunshots (I.e. footage, bullet wounds) I suspect they would state rather than quote.
I get that it seems awfully calous to cast doubt on the words of the vulnerable, but the fact remains there are those who mask lies behind a veneer of vulnerablility, it's best practice for a reason.
I mean, "at war" is the one time a small economy should be able to afford expensive equipment, since military spending becomes a priority. Look at isreal for an example of an economic midget nonetheless building the Merkava
Again this is a case of "it depends". If you are not a market driver then yes it does. ('mom & pop motor vehicles' isn't going to make a dent in the global car market. )
I feel like a lot is being swept under the rug of "quality", there.
To make an analogy, I am reminded of when chirstians say a "true babtism" saves the soul, and then you look into their theology and it turns out they only believe 0.5% of babtisms to be genuine.
A quality education could be a panacea for all things, that still wouldn't be a good argument for paying for an extra three years schooling, unless you can actually guarentee those years will be a "quality education".
There's a serious case of deminishing returns to education. I know plenty of people who've gone through a good high school and 4+ years of university only to come out of it with not a shred of curiosity or critical thinking skills. I couldn't tell you why, sure it's quite possible their teachers just weren't passionate enough, or their class rooms small enough. It's also possible they just don't value 'not being stupid' enough to even try.
Would your parents have pulled you out of school if it had not been illegal?
What punishment would you have desired to be put upon them if they had?
Why stop at sixteen? Plenty of adults are stupid, children at least tend to still have some their natural curiosity, unstrangled by the world. I suggest mandatory refresher courses, each adult spends every other tuesday evening at a local community centre, learning the latest in medicine, ecology, queer theory, historical research etc... If they fail to attend they get a fine of two days wages. That's hardly unreasonable? Afterall the current polycrisis is urgent! can we really afford to wait 40 years (first for the new education to be implimented) then for the children who go through it to reach positions of influence in society, the skills they've learned dulling against the grindstone of bloodless office jobs all the while?
Yeah, it's nice to have, but it didn't cure my stoopid did it?
Same as a glass of orange juice.
But some operational costs (I.e. Ground Rent, Marketing, Legal Fees, IP Costs etc...) do not scale with increased output.
even Ayn Rand didn't particularly like Ayn Rand,
not to say she was rational of course.
Wow, I can't believe that the transfiguration of jesus was so poorly translated by latin scholars.