TranscendentalEmpire

now you're doing the "I'm rubber, you're glue" thing

Just giving you a taste of your own medicine.... No reason to be honest to a person who is obviously not interested in an honest conversation. This is a foreseeable conclusion when relying so heavily on arguments.

Ahh, I was hoping it was "I won't be responding to any further post". That one's on me, guess I was being optimistic.

Though it is strange that you would suddenly start saying you're ignoring certain aspects of the post, when you've been ignoring most of the argument the whole time.

This is becoming quite gaslighty

Unoriginal and a liar, what a catch you are! I bet you have to beat suitors off with a stick anytime you leave your goon cave.

"Come up here and let's do proper discourse" (yes I know you didn't say it, but I wish you did

Lol, is not pointing out the fallacy and trying to bring the conversation to the claim at hand several times not enough?

Good day to you, I need to get back to my doom scrolling and cat video's

Fair, have a good one.

so I think I won't reply to the rest of your post.

This you?

Of course I look for arguments that suit my biases,

a logical fallacy isn't a valid argument....

transcended and shed your human weaknesses? Are you an entity of pure energy?

Lol, of course. Apparently it's the only way to recognize logical fallacies on the internet. Great rebuttal though, must be the power of beige.

You did not "interpret," you simply told me what you decided I was doing.

Lol, what do you think interpretation means?

Imagine if you stopped lying and just admitted you were wrong...

Tell it to the man in the mirror.

Weren't you supposed to be shutting up sometime soon? Or was that another lie as well?

you told me what I was doing:

Lol, interpreting someone's motives is a matter of opinion. I can't scientifically prove your motivations were virtue signalling and stroking your own ego, and you can't scientifically prove they weren't your motivations.

am not going to address the rest of your post.

Still waiting for you to shut up..... Please, be my guest.

The thread started as a series of criticisms, it devolved into "who you wit?" because of a strawman argument. One that I've been pointing at the whole time.

But, it seems people like yourself are just extremely susceptible to arguments based on logical fallacy that suit your innate biases.

Lol, you said you didn't care about your influence teaching people to disregard criticism via logical fallacy. I think that makes your motivations selfish in nature.

Opinions you don't agree with aren't lies, your hurt feelings don't dictate what is and isn't true.

Another dishonest rebuttal.

I'm not going to address the rest of your post.

Great, go kick rocks for all I care. Some fresh air would probably do you some good anyways.