Rottcodd

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I saw in another article too that after they admitted that it had in fact happened, they claimed that the problem was that Media Matters had made it seem to be more common than it in fact was.

The reality of course is that MM just reported that it had happened. And used-to-be-twitter has already admitted that much.

So yeah - they're going to get their asses handed to them in this lawsuit.

The problem though is that we're now in a timeline in which the fascism-adjacent demagogues who support Musk are so invested in their narrative that they're going to view the failure of the lawsuit as some sort of contrarian proof that it was justified. To them, it's not going to fail because MM's accusation was in fact legitimate, but because "blah blah blah deep state something something great replacement yadda yadda woke mob."

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

...launched what he called a "thermonuclear lawsuit" against Media Matters, which accused it of artificially manipulating the social network’s algorithms to achieve the contentious juxtapositions (while admitting that they had in fact occurred).

This is my favorite part of this whole story.

It's like the narcissist's prayer directly translated into a lawsuit.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

I was just thinking the other day that it's about time to replay this game. So I guess it is.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

I prefer "used-to-be-twitter." I think it captures the context better, and it's clunky, as it should be.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 36 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Of course they are - they're psychopaths.

They're each and all people who, in a sane society, would be institutionalized in order to protect others from the harm they inevitably do as a consequence of their complete lack of principles, morals, empathy and remorse. But instead they're allowed to run free, and this is what we get.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Of course they did - that's the point.

And it doesn't matter in the slightest that there's no substance to any of their allegations, because the entire purpose is just to get the idea that there's something there to investigate out into the world.

And it'll likely work, no matter what, because Republican voters are angry morons, so all they're going to get no matter what is "investigate the Jan. 6 investigators because [words]," so it really doesn't matter if those words make sense or not.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Money wins, every time.

And right there, you answered your own (presumably rhetorical) question.

The money people jumped on AI as soon as they scented the chance of profit, and that's it. ALL other considerations are now secondary to a handful of psychopaths making as much money as possible.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago

The "why" is certainly that someone in the state beef industry gave him a pile of money.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

A Supreme Court justice, on the other hand, costs as much as a luxury motor home.

Exactly as much as a luxury motor home in fact...

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Ironic that the thread is about men dying on average younger than women, and the majority of the responses are people completely ignoring that fact and instead just taking an opportunity to negatively stereotype men so they can shit on them collectively.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This whole thing is just creepy as hell. This guy has some serious and disturbing psychological issues.

And he's a fucking politician. People actually decided that they wanted him to represent them in government.

More all the time, I feel like I've somehow been trapped on an alien planet, surrounded by a bizarre race of inexplicably stupid lunatics.

view more: ‹ prev next ›