Rottcodd

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I don't think I'd bother with a kbin app anyway - I'm fine with the way it is already.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Ah. Yes - I agree entirely.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I sure as hell hope it doesn't become mainstream - I don't think there's ever been a single thing that's benefitted over the long-term from mainstream popularity.

I understand that you don't want to be seen as gatekeeping, but I don't share that aversion. I overtly want the fediverse to remain somewhat confusing and opaque, and specifically so that dumb and/or impatient and/or lazy people will stay away. I think that every single person who gets confused and frustrated here and goes back to Reddit or Twitter is a net gain for the fediverse.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I want an echo chamber of users with empathy

Really?

I would think then that at the very least, you wouldn't be such an asshole.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll be mildly curious to see how it will fail to pass.

That it will fail to pass is guaranteed.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

You don't need a mod or a bot to do it for you. You can go find communities on other instances and subscribe to them, and that all by itself gets them added to the All feed on your home instance.

Or you could just register an account on a different instance that slready has more stuff on it, like lemmy.world.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hell no.

How does that "help" their feed? What possible benefit could there be in using a bot to subscribe willy-nilly to every community out there, no matter how shitty it is?

I mean - if some instance owner wants to do that, that's their choice, and I guess there are people out there who would like the resulting instance filled to the brim with every bit of garbage that exists anywhere in the fediverse, so it's safe to assume that somebody will do it sooner or later. Personally, I think the idea is repulsive though.

Maybe I wasn't clear enough in that other post - I think that the fact that each instance has a different "All" depending on what the members there have subscribed to is a good thing. It means that different instances have different feels, and over time, as they get more established, that's going to be even more the case.

So for instance, a notably tech-oriented instance is going to end up displaying pretty much every tech-oriented community on the fediverse on its All because somebody on the instance will have subscribed to it, pretty much no matter what it is, AND at the same time, all of the stuff nobody's interested in just won't be there at all, because nobody bothered to subscribe to it in the first place.

Granted that that's not going to appeal to people who want to be flooded with every bit of garbage on the entire fediverse when they click All, but they can just go away and sign up with some other instance that gives them what they want. Which I'm sure is exactly what the people who sought out a tech-oriented instance in the first place would prefer anyway.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Right, but there are lots of ways around that.

There's already been a fair amount of demand for some method to group communities by interest, so it's essentially guaranteed that somebody is going to provide some way to do that, and likely multiple somebodies are going to figure out multiple ways.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Note that this is one of the advantages of having an account on a smaller and/or more focused instance or having multiple accounts.

All "Alls" are not the same. Actually, the "All" displayed on a given instance is everything local to that instance and everything from other instances to which someone on that instance has subscribed. So if nobody from that instance has subscribed to a particular community on another instance, then for all intents and purposes, it just doesn't exist. Even on "All".

Granted that it's somewhat unlikely for an instance to not have someone somewhere along the way subscribe to some notably popular community, it is possible, and the smaller and more focused the instance is, the more likely it is.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I've reached the point that nothing Texas does even surprises me.

Weren't they threatening to secede?

I wish they'd get on with it.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah - the whole dynamic of claiming that you don't intend to do the specific shitty thing that you then intentionally and specifically do is infuriating already, and "yuck your yum" just adds an extra layer of cringe to it.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like I said, I'm sure it's just a coincidence that they repeat the word "community" at least 30 times on that page.

Oh, and this bit too, that I just noticed when I was counting "commumity"s:

Communities are the lifeblood of the Internet. But on today's Internet, they are not in charge of their own destiny. Instead, they are controlled by the large platforms that hold all the power online. It is time for a change.

Community Points are the first step towards a different future for online communities.

That's definitely just a coincidence and has nothing at all to do with trying to compete against the fediverse, which they definitely don't even pay any attention to.

Yup.

view more: ‹ prev next ›