this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
311 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3527 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Officers working for Gov. Greg Abbott’s border security initiative have been ordered to push small children and nursing babies back into the Rio Grande, and have been told not to give water to asylum seekers even in extreme heat, according to an email from a Department of Public Safety trooper who described the actions as “inhumane.”

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"President Biden has unleashed a chaos on the border that’s unsustainable, and we have a constitutional duty to respond to this unprecedented crisis.”

…by trying to fucking kill them.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That quote is huge, it demonstrates the sheer amount of insanity these people have.

President Biden has unleashed a chaos on the border that’s unsustainable

we have a constitutional duty to respond to this unprecedented crisis.”

It's this kind of people you're all dealing with. (I was about to "we" but I got stalked after saying "we" here because I'm not American)

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's not even proto fascist, it's full on non debatably fascist

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Now, imagine you live on the NORTHERN border of the US, and you still hear rhetoric like that you’ve quoted from the article from your political representatives. This is shit I see almost once a week from my US representative living on the red side of Washington State.

Never mind that a) we’re literally as far as one gets from the southern border, and b) the rural farmers out here rely on immigrants for their labor. It is truly baffling to me how this is a top 5 issue for the constituency around here.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I still want one of these idiots to explain how Biden somehow personally did this. Not to mention that during his administration more border crossers have been caught and undocumented people deported than the previous admin ever did.

Then again the previous admin just liked keeping people in cages and giving their shitbag politicians and officials tours.

[–] crossover@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s what Jesus would want.

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

basically baptism if you dont think about it too hard

[–] MidwestMayonaiseSalad@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somehow I feel like “I was just following orders” is going to be a sufficient defense in this case.

[–] TheK@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

So many heinous atrocities have been committed by people who were “just following orders”

It’s really disconcerting.

[–] zib@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How very Christian of them.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aww, c'mon. It's just a little rough housing. Boys will be boys. Why are you getting so worked up over this?

Or something like that..

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Locker room abuse

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of a story from Nazi Germany where a Jewish woman was holding her baby on a train platform and the baby wouldn't stop crying. A Nazi guard came over, grabbed the baby by the feet, and slammed it against a brick wall as hard as he could. He then handed the baby back to the mother and said something like "it's quiet now."

The people that support this are just like Nazi guards.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've reached the point that nothing Texas does even surprises me.

Weren't they threatening to secede?

I wish they'd get on with it.

[–] zib@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only a small group of Texans seriously talk about secession, and of course they haven't the first clue what that would actually mean for them. But, there's also the super awkward juxtaposition between wanting to secede and be an "American patriot", so those idiots can't even agree on what they actually want other than to hate minorities.

[–] weedazz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well wanting to secede is kind of the whole basis of the USA. these "patriots" have convinced themselves they're the real Americans and everyone else is wrong, so they're trying to follow order 1776

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lost the right to that when TX surrendered after the Civil War.

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

yep, no states are allowed to secede anymore - if the Nation dissolves then they can find their own way or whatever

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Going in and taking the state back for the union would probably be the fastest way to take care of most of the problem people... You might be on to something.

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this is psychotic.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when you make Palpatine your governor.

[–] BusterStatus@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really hard to understand how this is a logical thought process that can be had by an elected leader and by extension how the voting public can look at someone like that and say, "yep, that's my guy."

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

"elected leader". nuff said

[–] ladybug@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone have a non paywalled version or the article text?

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Always Disable Javascript on a news website. It stops videos and pop-ups like what you are seeing.

[–] ladybug@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m on mobile unfortunately.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copy the link and paste it into the website archive.ph and see if it works.

[–] ladybug@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

That worked, thanks so much!

[–] islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

but the Rio Grande is a river. do we deny them access to the river or push them into the river? seems nonsensical at best

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between water and clean drinking water.

[–] PrometheusG@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We can't deny them access to the river since Mexico owns the other shore. So they're free to jump in, free to swim across, just not get out the other side.

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I guess there should be an aquabarrier mid river then?

load more comments
view more: next ›