Redfox8

joined 8 months ago
[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks for clarifying. My point was not to ilicit sympathy, any such violence is ahorant and the perpetrator must take responsibility, ultimately, but rather to illicit empathy. To understand how and why people end up in such a place then creates the starting point to find solutions, or at least, minimise how frequently they may occur within a population in the future.

As such, I'm inclined to think that in at least some of the cases where the individual commits suicide once the police turn up, they have reached a total breaking point, so to speak, and the last option they can see has gone so suicide is sll that's left.

This to me doesn't suggest a 'bad' person, more so someone who has found themselves in a terrible place, particularly in cases where that's no fault of their own, and are wndingvup doing something bad. Being 'bad' to me is closer to gansta/mobster mentality - e.g. killing people is fine, so long as its not us, and i cant imagine any mass shooter being someone like that. There are a myriad of variables of course, and this may only apply to some of the people painted as 'bad' in this infografic.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz -1 points 1 week ago

I understand clearly that you think domestic cats are a natural part of the ecosystem, which they are not. Just because they were introduced a long time ago that doesn't make them natural predators, and just becsuse their impact on native wildlife started a long time ago, that only makes it all the more damaging.

Yes we have wildcats, but like any animal, they have a natural niche. Domestic cats are simply everywhere and their populations are sustained by humans far far above any possible natural population numbers.

Therefore it is completely relevant to keep domestic cats indoors. I don't know about the US approach you're referring to, but I expect that domestic cats can have a similar impact there as anywhere.

There is simply nothing natural about domestic cats in natural ecosystems. I presented four peices of evidence and you still don't see it!

The say the UK lacks predators, you clearly seem to have read one thing about it (I'm guessing about wolves, and therefore large predators, which have a completely different ecological niche to small cats, wild or domestic) and extrapolate that to equate this idea of yours!

You've simply got it wrong.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Phwarrr, that's a sexy pose ;)

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

That's me on the left with my sister. The cat was called Thomas. Any guesses as to the 'pc' ?

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

...it shrunk a bit...

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

I need the text highlighted please, I've no idea what anyone is talking about...

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think we need to know what the UI looks like before a selection has been made, or what it looks like when the curser is over each option. The 'interface' part is lost by a single screen shot.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Two women vying against each other? Regardless of political ideology, the men would create a hellstorm of bullshit beyond anything else. The candidates views and speaches would be drowned out by male commentary galore.

It'd be a gargantuan mess and no-one would really know what was actually going on, decades later even.

Yay misogyny.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks Bob.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 34 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Makes sense, use the prey's weight and momentum to do the hard work, rather than the relativly feable arm of a much smaller creature!

view more: next ›