I'm thoroughly enjoying it.
RavenFellBlade
joined 1 year ago
Wow, I had forgotten about how much I loved these. My favorite phone ever was the HTC G2. LOVED that keyboard!
Add in an IR blaster, and that's my whole list.
I'm aware. I've been through half a dozen of them and don't want to buy another. An aux cord costs $5 and last practically forever unless you abuse them. My car has built-in Bluetooth, but it has a weird delay and randomly disconnects, mutes, or starts changing what I'm playing on my phone like a remote is pressing buttons.
1/4"? Feh. I use only XLR for my audio needs. /elitist audiophile
I bought a USB-to-aux adapter because my current phone does not have a headphone jack and my vehicle doesn't have Bluetooth. I use it literally every day, sometimes for hours. It's utter nonsense that they are getting rid of them.
The Statue of Liberty was at least original. The Daleks have been "wiped out" so many times, only to reappear with either minimal handwaving to explain how, or with explanations that take entore story arcs to explain only to be retconned two seasons later. They are the original 'somehow Palpatine returned'. It's tired. The Cybermen are almost the exact same story.
This man is touching kids. He's so covered in "I Touch Kids" red flags, he may as well be a billboard for Kidtouchistan.
Some of my favorite Doctor Who moments. I really hope they never bring them back and turn them into generic "villain of the season" like they have with Daleks and Cybermen.
The King's Field Trilogy on PS1. These games bounced off me hard back in the day, but I got curious about them after reading about their influence on Souls. These were games that were waaaay ahead of their time, and so satisfying now that I have the patience to really appreciate what From Software were trying to create. Also: definitely play the translated version of the first Japanese one.
I'm pretty sure moaning, whimpering, and forcefully suppressed screams will do the trick.
The mind-bending thing about it is thus: there are an infinite multitude of "you" throughout the multiverse expressing every "you" that could, or even could not, be. However, there are infinitely more realities with no "you" at all. The set of infinities containing an expression of "you" is necessarily smaller than the set of infinities that do not contain an expression of "you" simply owing to the very narrow nature of eventualities required to express "you" into existence. In point of fact, that set if infinitesimal labeled "you" is infinitesimal in comparison to the set labeled "not you", and yet still uncountable in its infinity.