PhilipTheBucket

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I didn't ask whether David Doonan had published a press release on a janky web site which was mostly complaining about Democrats trying to remove Green Party members from the ballot, in this FPTP election. This also somehow finds a way to blame the lack of RCV on the Democrats, when a lot of them support it. Here's a list:

https://fairvote.org/our-reforms/ranked-choice-voting/endorsers/

I don't see any Green Party people there. I have never heard Jill Stein talk about it, and I've heard her say a bunch of things. That's strange to me. But regardless of that, that's not what I asked. I also didn't ask whether you plan to vote for Kamala Harris. My question was:

Anyone in this thread who is saying Jill Stein is extremely important, but haven’t been saying anything about ranked choice voting or changing the voting system to make third parties realistic: Why? What’s your goal, why did you make that decision about your priorities?

Do you want to answer that question? You don't have to. You can change the subject again, if you'd like to.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 129 points 1 month ago (25 children)

!rcv@ponder.cat

Any third party that's telling you to vote for them under FPTP, but isn't heavily promoting RCV to fix the system, isn't trying to win. They're trying to spoil the FPTP election.

RCV is already law in a surprisingly large number of places. It may change the majority in the house in this upcoming election, because the difference in vote-counting within the two states that use it for US congressional elections might be enough to change the razor-thin outcome.

RCV is on the ballot, in one form or another, in 7 states and DC this year. Go vote. You might be able to fix the system, and move toward the future that all the people in this thread who are being vocal about Jill Stein say that they want. Remember back when marijuana was illegal? That changed. This can change too, and it would be glorious, for a lot of important goals that a lot of people claiming to support Jill Stein claim they're supportive of. It would be practical and realistic. It would work.

Anyone in this thread who is saying Jill Stein is extremely important, but haven't been saying anything about ranked choice voting or changing the voting system to make third parties realistic: Why? What's your goal, why did you make that decision about your priorities?

The answer is obvious, of course. But it's fun to ask.

@anticolonialist@lemmy.world, why?

I'll add more @s as more people pipe up. They always do.

Register and vote, for RCV as well as for Harris. We have 25 more days.

https://www.vote.org/

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I realized that it's pretty easy for the bot to just subscribe me to any good-sized community from an Mbin or Piefed server, and then get MAU counts from the Lemmy API. I've done that now. It's a bit of a hack, but communities from those instances are included in the list as of now.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 1 month ago

I'm pulling data from lemmyverse.net, so it is only Lemmy right now.

I just tried to add Mbin, but it looks like Lemmyverse doesn't have the same MAU counts for Mbin that it does for Lemmy. I like the idea of adding it, if I can get it. Do you know of a place that summarizes MAU and subscriber count for those platforms?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So, what changed?

Support !rcv@ponder.cat if you want an alternative to the duopoly. It's on the ballot in a lot of places coming up.

If you're not doing that, but you are choosing to vote for a spoiler candidate, you can anticipate a whole lot more duopoly in the future.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 1 month ago

Lemmy claims to be able to support any Bootstrap 5 theme as a drop-in Lemmy theme, and it's surprisingly close to being true. If you go to ponder.cat right now, you'll see one, based on Sandstone, that I've been fooling around with, because the provided Lemmy themes are mostly awful to me.

You could run one backend instance, have a main frontend to it on lemmy.whatever.com, and have a second frontend on whatever.com, with the theme set to a minimally modified version of Clean Blog or something, stripping out all the UI stuff and leaving only a blog. That would give you an RSS feed, a blog, a community that Lemmy people could follow, and a Fediverse actor that Mastodon people could follow, all in one place with all the comments unified. If you want to set the theme up that way, I can give you pointers, since I've just now been working on this for my instance.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 1 month ago

I think you would need more RAM than that. Between Rust and Node, I probably wouldn't try to make do with less than 2 GB at a bare minimum, and 4 might be better.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh?

Manifest v3 is not the rendering engine. The issue with manifest v3 is that the extension format is changing, so it'll be more difficult to make ad blocker extensions work on Chrome. But a Chromium fork that is focused on privacy, of which there are several, and an ad blocker of which there are several, want to work together to make sure that their ad blocker is still working on the Chromium fork in question, it's hard for me to see it being insurmountably difficult for them to collaborate on an API that will let it happen.

It's not automatic, it can be difficult since they're diverging from Chromium. But it is not on the same scale as trying to maintain a divergent browser engine.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's very cheap. Hostinger's cheapest tier ($17/mo) can easily handle a single-user Lemmy instance. You'll have to once in a blue moon worry about the image storage growing without limit, but it's a solvable problem.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nothing questionable that Mozilla does can affect the forks, as long as the forks have enough manpower to sustain themselves. There are, in fact, a few examples of projects with questionable leadership getting abandoned by their userbase, as everyone migrates to the fork.

I think what you need to worry about is whether the fork you're using has enough momentum and developer time that it's going to stay alive. That's a concern whether or not you have a concern that the central leadership is going to do something obscene.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t think their aim is to be beneficial.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Thank you! It is monthly active user count (MAU) divided by number of subscribers. That gives a good metric for active communities, with a preference for newish communities with a lot of organic activity.

A few times a day, it takes the highest community by that metric, that has at least 50 subscribers and hasn't already been posted, and posts it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›