Paradigm_shift

Just saw your message. I ended up replaying the old spyro games in the remastered version and loved the nostalgia trip.

Tried to get into Outer Wilds again, stopped almost instantly because I just can't figure out the movement.

Then I saw that Oxenfree 2 had released at some point, played that but wouldn't recommend ( if you played the first game you already know the big "mystery" and the new smaller mystery isn't that interesting)

I played chants of sennaar, loved it, fit the vibe perfectly. Would absolutely recommend!

I played planet of lana, it was somewhere between okay and good. Visually perfect gameplay a bit boring. Even for a short game it felt too long at the end.

Then I made the mistake of opening rimworld again and this became my (gaming) life again.

I don't know if I played it before my post or after but Talos Principle 2 was perfect just like the first one.

In my opinion, the question comes down to "what is a valid criticism". I think the bombing part, where a lot of people give a similar negative review at the same time is secondary.

If a game releases in a borderline unplayable state this warrants negative reviews. It shouldn't matter how many of them there are and if they are all in a similar time frame. Same with an update that harms the game a lot. If this makes the game change the rating from positive to mixed or negative, I think that's fair because if I buy the game now, I will get it in the most recent state and if this is shit I don't care if it was better at some point in the past, I'm glad if I get a warning through the reviews.

If the game gets negative reviews because a person/group related to creating the game said or did something that a large group of people disagree with it's more complicated. It boils down to if you can/want to separate the art from the artist and if you find that criticized thing bad in the first place. If you don't think this is a valid criticism you probably think this "review bombing" is a bad thing.

I think the term "review bombing" is used to imply that the criticism has nothing to do with the game itself. But like with all terms, the usage becomes broader and broader until it changes or loses meaning completely.

Since Steam reviews contain written explanations it is easy to check why the game gets the negative attention. I never came across a game that had a lot of reviews for an unrelated thing where almost all the negative reviews lied and said it was bad for gameplay reasons.

Oh I didn't realize it got released on PC!

My opinion of life is strange is kinda complicated I liked it as a "Summer Game" because it had the right vibes while I played it but after I was done I was disappointed. The game hypes it's "your action have consequences" system up constantly but it's usually just a different dialogue or short scene which doesn't affect the story in a major way. Which is fine for a game in general but not when it pretends it's different.

Never heard of it, looks amazing, I'll check it out, thanks

Looks great! The Alps is where I spend a lot of my vacation days, why not add some nights as well haha

I played slay the princess earlier this year, amazing game! Detroit become human has been on my wishlist forever. Maybe now is a good time to finally buy it. Not sure about coffee talk but until then looks promising. I'll check out the demo

It won't be long till fall so it can go on the list. Might be perfect for summer-is-almost-over-sadness

I'll take a closer look at Tchia. I don't necessarily search only for no-pressure-at-all cozy games. I just don't want a game that barely let's you breathe and/or requires extreme precision. Like, I don't want to be playing elden ring (right now and for the next few weeks).

The most important thing is the warm atmosphere and some moments that create lasting impressions

I think yakuza might fit. I have to check if the steamdeck can handle it. If not it'll go on my list for when I am okay with my pc heating up my living room

I just can't get into outer wilds, the ship controls drive me insane.

The big con looks promising