Olgratin_Magmatoe

As for chaos needed for determination of will, that’s because will requires intelligence. A controlled environment doesn’t lead to intelligent choice but rather patterned outcome. ChatGPT is a good example of this

So what turns a controlled environment into a chaotic environment? And what is the problem with a patterned outcome? Intelligence was still used, so what do the results matter?

This all seems quite arbitrary.

As for the “all-loving” part, an argument could only be made for that, from my perspective at least, depending on how you define “love” here. If they sees us the same way we see creations we make and love, then it would explain to some degree why the suffering is still allowed.

The problem with this is than an all loving, omni-benevolent being not just has love for all, but maximal love for all, which contradicts the notion of willingly allowing suffering to exist in any form.

it could be the same point of view that we have towards a vehicle.

"You are so lowly that it is permissible to harm you" is not the point of view of an omni-benevolent being.

There can’t be free-will if there wasn’t any choice. If there there are choices, there is the potential for evil choices.

I am hungry. I decide to make myself a sandwich, with peanut butter, and one of the following:

• strawberry jam
• honey
• grape jelly

None of these are evil, yet they are choices.

Also if proving something about religion is paradoxical proves that religion is wrong, by the same logic proving something about math or science is paradoxical proves those are wrong.

This is a false equivocation. Proving that a fundamental part of a religion (such as a tri-omni god) to be paradoxical means everything built off of that idea is wrong. The same applies for math and science, but when large swaths of things in math and science get proven wrong because of a underling assumption that later turned out to be false, we get closer to the truth. That's how we went from a geocentric model, to a heliocentric model, to the understanding that there isn't any discernible center to the universe.

Halting Problem? Math is false! Schrodinger’s Cat? Physics is false!

Those problems do not prove math and science to be false, as they do not challenge fundamental assumptions.

Following this trend means that all of the efforts by atheists to point out paradoxes in religion doesn’t accomplish anything.

Nah. This paradox quite clearly debunks the idea of a tri-omni god presiding over the universe. This is a fundamental assumption within some major religions, and it's wrong. By extension the ideas built off of it are wrong.

Do the same for math and science and you'll lead to new discoveries.

What a terrible age to have eyes.

I have no horse in this race, but the fact that you're being communicative and taking any responsibility means you're probably a better mod than most. Admittedly, it's a low bar but still.

Probably best not to do it again though.

But when I do so in factorio nobody congratulates me

Void star labs/Zach Freedman moment

Because my commuter motorcycle (KTM 390 duke) gives me like 30-35km/L easy, no way a hybrid is more efficient

My prius c can get 20 km/l at the minimum, about 25 km/l on average, and about 30 km/l on a really good day. Winter is the worst due to the need for the heater on startup. Granted, it's not a plug in hybrid, so it isn't getting the maximum efficiency as it could.

Currently trying to switch over to a bike, gonna try to get it a mid drive upgrade. Should have a fraction of a percent of the carbon output of my car.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

We've jokingly tested it at work. Yes, you can, at least with gitKracken.

But don't lol

My first PR at my current job was about 130 files for the front-end, and about 70 for the backend. This hits close to home.

Because I'm talking about a different thing, and I was asking a question.

I'm a different user. I'm talking about your claim about the U.S. having more rights than ever, not the other claim.