Magnergy

joined 1 year ago
[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Old reruns of Alf.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, people make up bs, other people spread it, old guy embarrasses himself saying it on tv, bomb threats. I have to be missing a step here.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Don't know about him, but the example I try to plant in people's minds is that early in his presidency, he wanted money for a wall, democrats wanted "dreamers" to get citizenship (and every state has infrastructure projects they want). Seemed like great deal making ground to me. I was prepared at the time to be wrong about him and waited to see anything come out along the lines of a bargain. But he proved unable to do it.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe try Antarctica as an example? There are a few people there, and it seems quite possible to settle without conflict (assuming some treaty alterations). Some atoll no one uses all the time? Maybe a lost cause, bloodfart doesn't seem all that interested in the good faith distinction you are pointing out.

I see your point though; the distinction, to me, motivates using less neutrally connoted wording. Something like "invaders" or "raiders". Nice and clear to everyone.

B seems rather intent on making sure the neutral word is seen as a morally charged one. Seems like making one hard project into two projects and thus just increasing the difficulty to me.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a source on the 'no scope' detail?

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I've heard that "no scope" detail elsewhere too. But would love to confirm it or have it disproven.

It is the detail that I keep coming back to that would indicate something about his state of mind, lack of rationality, lack of time, something.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Hmm... Katamari Damacy, Braid, Portal 1 2 combo. Subnautica.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Iirc, the future government (? I guess) weren't trying to find the source to stop the release, but to get a pure sample to study so as to cure the disease in the future. The lady on the plane was there to get the sample.

[–] Magnergy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ditto.

Canceling cable used to be, at the very least, a long, phone call that alternated between stretches of hold music dulling the senses and combative sales technique verbal jousting. Canceling a streaming service... I don't think that has ever taken me more than four minutes of finding a webpage and clicking. The collective consciousness is in danger of forgetting/underplaying just how far we have come on this.

If pirating ever takes less than four minutes every other month, I guess it will have reached convenience parity. But it certainly wasn't that back when I was in that game. And I really, really doubt it is now.

view more: next ›