Balfour was bad, Herzl was bad in 1896.
Maeve
joined 1 month ago
And yet the Nuremberg defense is no defense at the Hague. Go figure.
It's mask-off really quickly when those who are kinder and engage when you flatly state you're not voting Dem, too.
Seeing what we did to Assange, Manning, Snowden and others, it's not exactly encouraging.
Either you're one of them or you aren't. Why are you defending them so hard?
No I'm happy with my inexpensive prints and not superpolluting everyone's environment. I applaud that stolen art was returned to heirs in the news and hope they offer it to zero fee entrance exhibition, eternally.
And making Dole pineapple upside-down cake with Imperial Sugar.
Edit: Turns out I was replying to sarcasm, unfortunately hard to tell these days
It sure is! It's my fault too. And it's sad that we can't tell anymore.
No worries. I understand the confusion. Thanks though.
Slightly nicer to your face if you simp hard enough. Their still grossed out and laughing, behind your back.
More like in offshore accounts, priceless art, "philanthropical" foundations, cars, plants, yachts, islands, stocks...
Gaslight harder
The reason it was top secret is because it's so egregious. Everyone who endorsed that campaign of persecution should be prosecuted and ousted, funds out back into Treasury.