What do you mean by "run"? A gouvernment should fund universities and research institutes who conduct such experiments. I am not opposed to the government having a say in which lines of research to fund in priority depending on what their political project. For example some grant dedicated to energy sources more carbon friendly. But the government should not be more specific topic-wise or method-wise, and should instead rely on panels of experts for questions such as which line of research looks promising enough to put in more gov money.
Liwott
joined 3 years ago
Why wouldn't they? What do they have to lose in such a federation? One may argue, as OP did, that they would want to spread their ideas to new publics, without being too afraid of losing their own.
Hence my question on whether they made any statement about not wanting to federate with leftist instances.
I get your point that their core ideology is nauseating and incompatible with any form of leftism. I'm also not saying anything along the lines of federating with them being any good.
I see thanks !
I see thanks !
Bakchodi.org [...] will never federate with leftist instances.
Can you link any such statement?
They often won’t defederate from you and get butthurt when you defederate from them.
This behaviour is well explained by their desire to fight for "absolute free speech", so it does not require the extra assumption that their intention is to gather attention.
On mastodon they’ll even do campaigns where they send suicide promoting dms with gore in them to lgbt people.
Even this one can be seen as overcompensating for the "pro-LGBT censure". While the ideology itself does not justify making these campaigns, it depicts censoring them as even worse.
Not saying they are right in any way, just that the core of the problem you describe is their ideology of absolute free speech, rather than it being misrepresented by attention-seeking individuals.
So while a communist could go to wolfballs and make posts, they won’t be moderated by staff but they will of course be in a sea of unpopularity due to the strong community bias shaped by both the site’s administration and community.
I am not sure I understand the difference with lemmy.ml. Do you have examples of people banned (edit : or post removed) because of their political alignment ? (I mean beyond the "no bigotry" rule)
that rings a bell, thanks !
Nice analysis !
From what I understand about the "lib right" instances, I would not say they don't have a politically biased administration. Individual freedom is fundamentally a liberal/libertarian value. In the case of wolfballs, their sidebar is very explicit about the admin's political opinions :
- the capitol riot picture
- refer to an explicitly liberal definition of tolerance
- opinions on gender
How do you define a women A women is defined as x chromosomes and no tallywhacker i.e probably not you
wolfballs maintains that God made all man kind equal in his eyes. Man and women. There is nothing in between either.
- antivax links
In addition to the biases that set instances apart, it is probably useful to mention that users of decentralised media will have a tendency to be more anti-corporate and/or privacy enthousiast, which is also probably why socialists and libertarians are more present here than soc-dems and liberals. Plus, as you said, being less mainstream platforms, they often have to face the arrival of banned users from other sites.
I think it is interesting to compare the recurrent migrations of banned Reddit users to Lemmy with last month's massive influx to Mastodon following the latest Elongate. I wonder how things will play out when a zillionaire offers to buy Reddit.
About stats, what happened in early 2021?
Only relevant sources and no insults, thanks I guess?
US played a direct role in both funding and orchestrating the coup
It did play a role, we agree on that; my point is that it is very speculative to assume that it single-handedly had the whole decisive power. Whether they truly led the revolution is a disputed fact, even among your sources. Same for choosing the new government, the phone call shows they had a say in that, but to my knowledge nothing shows that they single-handedly picked the whole government, as there were other parties involved, including Ukrainian pro-EU and Ukrainian nazis.
That they were going to join NATO is a pure speculation based on the opinions that
- US held all the decisive power over that government
- US's only goal is military expansion
About the latter, do you think an economic weakening of Russia through the EU-deal would not already be a favorable turn for the US? I recall that the official position of the Maidan government was that it was not planning to become a NATO member, at least until the annexation of Crimea.
view more: next ›
I am very eager for the day where the countries just lose their sovereignty within a true European nation. But before that, we need more democratic European institutions. National vetoes would be a problem if they were directed to decisions of the European people, but not so much to when they are directed to ones of the French or German government.