Lightdm

joined 1 year ago
[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (8 children)

AFAIK they would get the info "which user said what". The source would be what ever instance you are from tho, not your own ip. So the owner of a instance knows as much as everyone else.

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I always thought that people hired to pen test are white hat hackers? What is the difference to red team?

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Could you point me to where it is in the quran?

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 9 points 9 months ago (6 children)

No, they just put it as background music in their videos, but didn't actually pay for it. I would guess it constitutes fair use?

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I am not sure as well, but maybe they meant "maybe an early and public disclosure increases the urgency of the fix for the developers"?

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Just fyi, I don't know about the guy, but he is standing on the dome of the rock, not a minaret.

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago

Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere kann man in FF mittlerweile auch mit der Maus in ner PDF kritzeln, damit müsste also auch unterschreiben (sehr rudimentär) gehen.

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

The 1949 geneva conventions have been rattified by (afaik exclusively): all UN members, palestine, the holy see and the cook islands. The singning binds the signee to uphold these rules for themselves. How then could the UN, who as you said is "just an extension of its member states", not follow the morals you yourself held as the absolute standard?

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

"Elementary, my dear watson" is a sherlock holmes "quote", which is sometimes used to roughly say "it is actually quite simple". Take away the "my dear" and the post roughly sounds like the "quote".

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

If you agree that humans alone can't claim what is universally right and wrong, then that is a first step towards religion, but I will leave that aside.
It seems like you agree that you have no basis on which to claim, with a degree of authority, that someone has to adjust their actions in your vicinity. If you don't contest this then I will leave this discussion, as you have confirmed, that you can't just forbid others from dressing in a certain way.
If you do not agree then I would like to understand how you can say that "morality is an entirely human inventes concept, no one has any foundation for it..." and then go on to say that somehow you can in fact impose your morality on others, as I understood it because their "made up stories are just way stupider than others"? According to which scale? One that does suddenly pop out of nowhere and is absolute for all humans?

[–] Lightdm@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Most governments indoctrinate their people with lies. Christianity and islam and strongly against xenophobia (I don't have much knowledge about judaism, so can't speak for or against it). Same goes for rape. Slavery is legal to this day in the USA for example.
I hope you can see my point, that standing on the moral basis of the modern western societies can make it seem like people, who live their lifes following different rules, may be "backwards" or "morally inferior" but you are lacking the logical foundation to claim something like that.

view more: next ›