They are programmatically token predictors. It will never be "closer" to intelligence for that very reason. The broader question should be, "can a token predictor simulate intelligence?"
Kolrami
Fillory and Further by Christopher Plover
within
The Magicians by Lev Grossman
what's easier? Convincing everyone you know to download signal or whatsapp or matrix or whatever or ~~having that built into the text app~~ [convincing everyone to buy the same phone].
FTFY
When presented this way, the choice is very different.
Yeah, that pretty much aligns with what I thought. A comment downvoted to -122.
First part is true, but irrelevant since it's a blue district like I tried to explain to the other dude. When I say blue, I mean she more than doubled her next closest opponent (the Republican candidate)'s votes. It would be a waste of AIPAC's money from their perspective.
Second part sounds like fan fiction because the users on Lemmy I've interacted with don't sound like people who want to see a solidly blue district turn red.
That's a primary. Different places have primaries at different times.
Yeah it does, because in the general election, she'll be the only Democrat. That's the purpose of the primary.
She won her primary a couple months ago and she's in a very blue district.
Harris is a common name for Americans. Sarah is too. Her name isn't Kalama. The error shows how exotic it is to you and your autocorrect.
I hear female supporters refer to her as Kamala. I think it might have more to do with the uniqueness of the name. I don't know of anyone who referred to Sarah Palin as Sarah.
It was always bs, but people on the Internet like spreading lies. I saw some politician go on MSNBC and she brought it up too. It's embarrassing if she believed it and spread it.
Watch her other interviews. She's always nervous and fidgety. She claims she gets uncomfortable doing those staged interviews for press circuits.