III

joined 1 year ago
[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your understanding is bad.

[–] III@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

instead of using his seemingly infinite wealth to engage in any real systemic change

Do we know this? I don't follow the comics at all but do they ever go into the things Bruce Wayne does as CEO of Wayne Enterprises? I can't fathom we have gone decades without someone touching on this.

[–] III@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

Stating Trump's constant lies and not answering questions was "not as bad" and the following that with a racial slur.

You are either a shitty bot or your Russian employer should fire you for sucking at this.

[–] III@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Remove the unnecessary outwardly facing "eyeball screens". There, cheaper.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I can recall numerous comedy movies I went to where I was the first to laugh. Like a full "ha" before everyone else started laughing. I am unsure if I influenced others to laugh, I was more satisfied that I didn't need another person to laugh to actually enjoy what I was seeing.

[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It wasn't "just" the audience. Sweetening enhances the laughing - it doesn't replace it.

I always thought of it this way. You see fun videos of sitcom outtakes, everyone is having fun on set. This means multiple takes. How hard would you imagine it is for an audience member, on the 15th take, to laugh? Sweetening.

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You are partially correct. The pacing is a thing, for sure.

But if you do watch those videos there are plenty of non-joke pauses for laughs. I can recall one where one of the guys walks up to the others sitting in the cafeteria and says "hey guys"... pause for laughs. He wasn't dressed funny, he wasn't doing anything odd, just... "time to laugh, I guess".

IMO, canned laughs are the tool of those that aren't really that good at writing comedy.

[–] III@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Free speech isn't the same as freedom from consequences for that speech. Hate speech is regulated for a reason. Likening hate speech to an "opposing opinion" is outing your actual agenda here.

[–] III@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Clearly, it's not like her literary skills allow her to reach the level of understanding irony.

[–] III@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Tennant, who once lowered himself to appear in a Harry Potter film, stated....

Better?

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Known Atheist, could beat the living shit out of Chuck Norris... had it filmed once.

view more: next ›