I just bought a series of 8bitdo controllers, and they are fantastic. The off green/purple USB Xbox controllers are literally $20 USD a pop and imo feel better than the Series S controller. And that's their cheapest option; if you are willing to spend money for more features, they keep getting better.
~~OP said he wants motion control though? I feel like his options for motion control controllers are EXTREMELY limited. Like Nintendo proprietary limited.~~
Apparently the 8Bitdo Ultimate DOES have motion control. I'd dare say it's just hands down the correct option, unless you want to just flat buy a Switch Pro controller. That said, if off-colours don't bother you, the Switch targeted Ultimate C Bluetooth is cheap af, has motion controls and actually has ABXY in the correct format.
So, these "awards" are just bought out, right? I just don't understand how anyone is expected to believe that people actually voted for these results. I can only assume money exchanged hands at some bot farms to put these AAA titles on the front page.
Even if you want to make some weird claims about "popularity contests", RDR2 taking the labour of love award over 4 live-service games that actually receive updates? If the vote is just mass visibility, I'd still expect Apex or the like to take it. And that's ignoring the reality that it makes no sense for RDR2 to have even made the ballot in the first place. You expect me to believe that that's one of the top 5 labour of love titles by open nomination? I mean, c'mon.
Likewise, Starfield taking any award while it sits at 64% positive reviews overall, and 28% positive recent? You expect me to believe that the same consumer base that gave it those horrible reviews still voted for it as "most innovative" of all things? The idea that anyone expects us to believe these are the results of genuine human votes in the era of fake account traffic, purchased viewership and AstroTurfing is just insulting.