Danterious

joined 1 year ago
[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That sucks. So much research is being twisted by humanity's greed. I hope that whatever comes after the internet becomes useless is better.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Long distances actually don't really mean much it can't be guaranteed that they actually correlate to much. It is mostly the local groups that are conserved and a bit of the global structure.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago

Yeah pretty much. There is also a weighting based on the percentage of comments in that community that come from that user.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it was included because there were no new comments made after august 1.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

I had to try scraping the websites multiple times because of stupid bugs I put in the code beforehand, so I might of put more strain on the instances than I meant too. If I did this again it would hopefully be much less tolling on the servers.

As for the cost of scraping it actually isn't that hard I just had it running in the background most of the time.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I've noticed there aren't many clusters that encode specific ideas (there are a few like the anime, nsfw, or sometimes instance level clusters). Most of it just seems to be a blend. Sorta disappointing.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

The original data had 21,000+ features. I used an algorithm to reduce the dimensions to 2 but keep a similar structure (so similar communities are close dissimilar communities are far away).

So the axes don't really mean anything in particular.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Probably a webgl problem. I had to use ungoogled chromium to open the page. I think it works on regular firefox too.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah that sounds like a good idea so you can see how connected local communities are. Probably makes more sense to use original dimensions so no extra information is lost.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago

Something that I find interesting is how close the central clusters of beehaw.org, slrpnk.net, and lemmy.blahaj.zone are together. If you only highlight those instances then you see how close their communities tend to be.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Total communities: 2986

Total users: 21934

So the dimensions were reduced from (2986, 21934) to (2986, 2)

Edit: Also yeah it is using Umap for the algorithm and it does do something pretty similar to what you described.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17079522

To keep it short the reason why some people are ok with authoritarianism is because most structures that we deal with on a daily basis are authoritarian.

Here is evidence that shows a significant amount of people are ok with authoritarianism:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/28/who-likes-authoritarianism-and-how-do-they-want-to-change-their-government/sr_24-02-28_authoritarianism_1/

This should be concerning.

And the thing is that it makes sense once you look at what are the most common systems that people interact with the most.

A clear example would be the Boss-Worker relationship. The boss creates a set of objectives/tasks for the worker and the worker sees them out. Rarely does the worker get the chance to set the higher level direction of what they are supposed to be doing with their time leaving them obedient to the boss and their demands.

Another example would be some Parent-Child relationships. Some parents treat their children as people that should show absolute respect towards them just because they are the parents not because they have something that is of value to the child (experience).

Even in the places where we do make democratic decisions those are usually made in ways that are supposed to be supplemental to authoritative decision making. An example would be how we don’t vote on decisions but instead how we vote on others to make decisions for us.

Once you add up all the experiences that someone has throughout their whole life you will see that most of them come into direct contact with authoritarian systems which means it makes that kind of way of thinking familiar and therefore acceptable.

Unlike democracy which is an abstract concept and something we only really experience from time to time.

If we want people to actually stop thinking authoritarianism is ok then we as a society are gonna have to stop using these kinds of systems / ways of thinking in our daily lives.

 

To keep it short the reason why some people are ok with authoritarianism is because most structures that we deal with on a daily basis are authoritarian.

Here is evidence that shows a significant amount of people are ok with authoritarianism:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/28/who-likes-authoritarianism-and-how-do-they-want-to-change-their-government/sr_24-02-28_authoritarianism_1/

This should be concerning.

And the thing is that it makes sense once you look at what are the most common systems that people interact with the most.

A clear example would be the Boss-Worker relationship. The boss creates a set of objectives/tasks for the worker and the worker sees them out. Rarely does the worker get the chance to set the higher level direction of what they are supposed to be doing with their time leaving them obedient to the boss and their demands.

Another example would be some Parent-Child relationships. Some parents treat their children as people that should show absolute respect towards them just because they are the parents not because they have something that is of value to the child (experience).

Even in the places where we do make democratic decisions those are usually made in ways that are supposed to be supplemental to authoritative decision making. An example would be how we don’t vote on decisions but instead how we vote on others to make decisions for us.

Once you add up all the experiences that someone has throughout their whole life you will see that most of them come into direct contact with authoritarian systems which means it makes that kind of way of thinking familiar and therefore acceptable.

Unlike democracy which is an abstract concept and something we only really experience from time to time.

If we want people to actually stop thinking authoritarianism is ok then we as a society are gonna have to stop using these kinds of systems / ways of thinking in our daily lives.

 

This is another post that alerted me of this.

https://lemmy.world/post/13287681

And here is the modlog:

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModRemoveCommunity

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/16395642

I'm looking for any examples that you might have encountered and links to them.

 

I'm looking for any examples that you might have encountered and links to them.

 

/s for anyone that doesn't get it.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/15455043

This is a science paper from 2015 that shows the corporate control over contrarian discourse around efforts to stop climate change.

 

This is a science paper from 2015 that shows the corporate control over contrarian discourse around efforts to stop climate change.

 

Link: https://flowingdata.com/2024/02/13/consumer-confidence-in-current-economic-conditions/

Edit: By the way even though they highlight Biden's inauguration as the time of the split I think the driving cause was the unequal recovery of the economy which is somewhat under Biden's control but not fully.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/14036406

This is a map of the internet that was made in 2011. I'm trying to find one that is newly updated.

I know of this one: https://www.halcyonmaps.com/map-of-the-internet-2021/

but it seems to be a bit too metaphorical and not detailed enough for me.

 

This is a map of the internet that was made in 2011. I'm trying to find one that is newly updated.

I know of this one: https://www.halcyonmaps.com/map-of-the-internet-2021/

but it seems to be a bit too metaphorical and not detailed enough for me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›