You wouldn't ban the teaching of material science to a future civil engineer.
You wouldn't ban the teaching of chemistry to a future pharmacist.
You wouldn't ban the teaching of aerodynamic sciences to a future car designer.
Why would you ban the teaching of gender identity and sexuality to a future psychologist if it's a core piece of knowledge required to excel at their profession?
Worldwide, yes, there are more Android users. In the US, almost 60% of people use iOS.
Modern Android devices already use RCS, we just need Apple to get on board.
Simply requiring that an actual article is linked (and not a screenshot of a retweet of a Twitter post of an opinion of a screenshot of an article headline) would be a great first step and easier to moderate.
No screenshots of article headlines. Always require a link to an article instead.
One of the biggest problems I had with reddit was the posting of editorialized headlines with no source. Once I would find the source (if the article is even real), I often find the article contradicts it's own headline or lacks any sources for the claims made. Of course, the screenshots would be upvoted anyway because people want to be outraged, regardless if the story is accurate or not.
Target near me just started selling a Roland brand Sriracha. It's not as sweet or "peppery" as the green cap huy fong sauce and has more of a vinegary garlic taste, but otherwise it's pretty close.
I've always ordered ink from inkjets.com because it's cheap and their cartridges are completely clear so you can actually see that they're full of ink like you'd expect.