this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
523 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Florida superintendents have been advised by the state's education agency to nix their Advanced Placement Psychology classes unless they exclude any topics related to gender or sexuality, according to a press release from The College Board.

Such a shift would mean the courses couldn't be called Advanced Placement, however, or used by students to earn college credit, the College Board said.

"We are sad to have learned that today the Florida Department of Education has effectively banned AP Psychology in the state by instructing Florida superintendents that teaching foundational content on sexual orientation and gender identity is illegal under state law," the statement reads. "The state has said districts are free to teach AP Psychology only if it excludes any mention of these essential topics."

In June, the College Board said they would not alter its popular AP Psychology class after the state asked the organization to review all AP courses to see if they "need modification to ensure compliance" with a Florida law and state Board of Education rule targeting instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neptune@dmv.social 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At some point Parental Rights is going to run up against Parents Who Want Their Kids to Go to College

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 year ago

Parental Rights is pretty much always right wing crazies trying to keep their kids ignorant and controlled

[–] CileTheSane@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

Republicans: iT's ScIeNcE
Also Republicans: don't teach science.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

DeSantis will literally ban psychology instead of going to therapy.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That’s the easiest thing to do, no way is he going to work on his self awareness. That goes against his values and principles.

[–] frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An AP psych course 20 years ago is how I figured out what I want to do for a living. That's super depressing because until that point I didn't know you could do brain research as a career.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does one go about getting into that field?

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Step 1) Don’t live in Florida

Most straightforward would be getting BS in psychology, neuroscience, or biology, then PhD in psychology/neuroscience programs or MD/PhD. The exact field varies quite a bit, you can have a background in engineering or mathematics as well. MD/PhD gives you more options in clinical research, regular PhD gives you more laboratory experience but you can always get involved in clinical research. I don't have an MD but I can still collect tissue or do assessments on patients for research in coordination with MDs

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I fully expect DeSantis to tell schools to still call it AP Psych only to get bitch slapped in court for it.

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I lived in Florida for a couple years before moving back to my home state and I can't imagine having a trans, gay or non-binary child. It's absolutely demoralizing to be in a place that is actively sparking hate against you.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’re well past that. At this point I can’t imagine having a child in Florida. I keep picturing myself in ten years trying to hire a new graduate, but not being able to accept them as educated

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For sure. I escaped with my pregnant wife at the time. We left because their healthcare is dog shit and I absolutely hated the people there. Most of them were transient rich people that treated everyone like shit.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Good for them

Edit: them being the college board

[–] Creamatine@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What exactly is good about this? It’s a psychology course. You don’t think that gender and sexuality are included in psychology?

Edit- retracted after op edit

I think they meant good on the AP board for not folding. A cursory look at their profile reveals them to be a lesbian so that’s the most likely explanation here, I think.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That the college board refused to cave. I think it’s a dangerous precedent if they had.

[–] Creamatine@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

My bad, totally misunderstood.

[–] CurrMudgeon@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You wouldn't ban the teaching of material science to a future civil engineer.

You wouldn't ban the teaching of chemistry to a future pharmacist.

You wouldn't ban the teaching of aerodynamic sciences to a future car designer.

Why would you ban the teaching of gender identity and sexuality to a future psychologist if it's a core piece of knowledge required to excel at their profession?

[–] norbert@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably because the people behind these changes by-and-large don't believe psychologists are needed. If you have any problems you should consult your pastor or something.

Pray the cray away?

[–] CileTheSane@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

If you have any problems you're a useful scapegoat. They don't want to give that up.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When is the book burning in front of the institute of gender studies? This parody isn't even funny.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s going to happen in Indiana. Like I have 0 doubt that these people will burn down the kinsey institute in 2025 if trump is re-elected

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he gets reelected I think that's probably what gets lefties to get as violent as the right if he survives that long.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

I seriously doubt it. If we're good at anything it's coming to social media to bitch and then do absofuckinglutley nothing about it until people start dying. When it's too late is usually when we riot. :/

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Can’t be crazy if there’s no mental health professionals, right? 🤷🏾

[–] Taiatari@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are so lost, such a shame..

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lost assumes they want to go in the right direction. I’m not sure the current leadership qualifies.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Malicious ignorance, they don't know any better because they don't want to.

[–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

How does banning teaching of certain topics mesh with the 1st ammendment?

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Fuck mini Hitler Ron Deathsantis. The court will likely strike it down.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Name on political move made by DeSantis that isn’t rooted in bigotry, misogyny, or racism.

Seriously. Is this dude from the 1930’s?

[–] ghostface@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

As a Floridian, check the history these guys come and go and their policies fade.

For those non Floridians its not as crazy as the papers make it seem, however these policies are crazy. The only Florida Republican to unite black Republicans against him. Even Trump couldn't do that!