CheddarBiscuits

He's been going strong for a decade... Took this pic in 2013.

So like, am I the only one that sees it behind the top pillar in the shadow? That little jut out of the shadow on top is actually the corner of the box... no?

Marble world? My dude you are awesome and spectacular! Thank you

R2D2, and I have routines to start it with gogo gaget vaccum as a command.

But you're proving my point, it's in the TOS... As I've mentioned in other relies, yes the wording should be changed, but it is there... Reasonable or not it's s in the fine print.

If you do not agree to those fine prints, do not agree to the TOS. You clicked or accepted somewhere at some point, so you do/did agree to this. If you do/did not, why did you accept the TOS in the first place?

I'm trying to drill home that just because you think it's shady, I do too, does not mean you did not agree to it in the first place.

Do not click accept if you do not accept a TOS.

Sacrifice! Perfect way to put it. Can't have your cake and eat it too. Who cares if a show is good if the production/distribution company is evil, don't contribute to the stats. Ignore it and move on.

I fully agree the wording should be 'rent'. I know when I use a digital service, I do not own these things, but have access to them via the TOS I agreed to. It's definitely shady to word it as 'buy' though, but that's what physical media if for... Again going back to the convince argument, if you want to own something tangible, buy physical.

My issue is the first line of your comment, that it's not realistic for the average user to read and or understand the TOS. You should not use the product if you have not done this. Period. And if you choose to not read and understand, then there is no more discussion to be had... Makes sense?

Hi no tits, I'm dad.

You can do that on the Connect app for Android.

This is the truest comment on the post.