Bronzebeard

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I've always found it with that we just have these very important wires just lying there exposed on the sea bed... You'd think this kind of stack would have happened much more previously

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Of all the other states, why is Kentucky of all things, the one you recognize?

When there's NY, California, or Texas in existence, and more importantly in media...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Not necessarily.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

This does not end up how you think it does. Not allowing for unchecked corporate power doesn't mean consolidation of government power into the hands of a few.

Our system is broken because we allow corporations to go around the people and buy influence directly from politicians. Not all systems have to do that.

But Removing the people that corporations are currently buying influence from doesn't mean they do being bad. It just means they have even fewer obstacles to doing what they want than they do now.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 10 points 7 hours ago

I was pretty surprised by the barrenness of my wishlist. There's been shockingly few titles I've been that excited about. Almost nothing in the AAA realm. And the few things that I am waiting to come out have been on that list for several years already...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 18 points 9 hours ago (12 children)

Getting rid of any concept of a state is what allows corporations to fill the gap. It's corporate feudalism. The only thing that can push back against a collective entity is another collective entity.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the dumb kind of "best do nothing, because both no is perfect" approach to making sure no disincentives are ever taken because someone somewhere else might also try to do the illegal thing that they'll lose access to the moment they're caught...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

And often it is not, but still treated that way by managers.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I want to be paid for getting the job done, not for being a body in a seat for a specific number of hours regardless of how much work there is to do.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Nah. Don't be so uptight. The 4 emails that I received during off hours will still be there if the insane amount of construction they keep starting but not finishing in my city causes me to be 10 mins late that morning.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I never suggested destroying the technology that is "AI". I'm not uncomfortable about AI, I've even considered pivoting my career in that direction.

I suggested destroying the particular implementation that was trained on the illegitimate data. If someone can recreate it using legitimate data, GREAT. That's what we want to happen. The tool isn't the problem. It's the method they're using to train them.

Please don't make up random ass narratives I never even hunted at, and then argue against them.

view more: next ›