Oh, I wasn't aware of this since the BBC article does not mention it. Then Disney's attempt to arbitrate based on the account terms barely holds water.
BlackEco
Apparently the same clause is in the Disney account terms used to buy the tickets to the park
Disney adds that Mr Piccolo accepted these terms again when using his Disney account to buy tickets for the theme park in 2023.
Which would hold more water than the clause in the Disney+ terms (that articles on the subject focus on way too much just for clickbait)
Jibreel Tramboo, barrister at Church Court Chambers, says the terms in the Disney+ trial are a "weak argument for Disney to rely on".
However, he says, the clause in the ticket purchase from 2023 may be a stronger case, "as there is a similar arbitration clause".
But anyway, it's really insensitive from Disney to try to arbitrate such a tragic incident.
PiHole with unbound (it's its own recursive DNS resolver so you don't depend on Cloudflare, Quad9 and others) set on my local network DHCP, plus AdGuard's DNS Proxy to use PiHole outside my home on my phone through DNS over TLS.
I think the "upgrade bugs" mentioned in the article are bugs happening when upgrading from previous LTS versions of Ubuntu, as usually the . 1
release is the first one to be suggested for upgrade to these installs.
24.04 was released in April, as usual. Here we're talking about 24.04.1, which could be seen as a "Service Pack" as it includes every patches released since then.
I meant add support to new robots other than Dreame. On Telegram he explicitly said he won't support any new Roborock nor Ecovacs
The creator of EyeChat created some rather interesting websites on which I lost a good 30 minutes on 😅
AFAIK Hypfer (Valetudo maintainer) has no intention to support new robots other than Dreame
As a note, Dennis Giese —who is the co-author of the Defcon talk mentioned in the article— is also the author of Dustcloud, which is used as the basis of Valetudo. Though I'm not aware that Valetudo will ever support Ecovacs robots.
I wonder what could be the issue here, I use the same image without any issue.
It rather sounds like too little free RAM or too agressive RAM management (frequent on Chinese phones) forcing Firefox to kill the tab as soon as you leave it.