this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2022
58 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34830 readers
148 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whoa, he has some ability to realize what he has taken part in creating.

“The days of Usenet, IRC, the web… even email (with PGP)... were amazing,” Dorsey said on Saturday in a tweet spotted by Mashable. “Centralizing discovery and identity into corporations really damaged the internet. I realize I’m partially to blame, and regret it.”

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beansniffer@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I realize I’m partially to blame, and regret it.

Then open source the code behind twitter, remove barriers to decentralization, encourage self hosting of twitter instances by making it easy for even normies to achieve. Twitter has the funds and ability to achieve this. Put up or shut the fuck up, Jack.

[–] electrodynamica@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's just like all the capitalists virtue signaling about Basic Income when literally no one would work for their shit companies if there was a basic income.

[–] beansniffer@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wouldn't UBI improve working conditions because companies that had bad working conditions would find themselves unable to attract workers and thus go bankrupt because they couldn't make money because they didn't have any workers? I can't tell if your comment is for or against basic income.

[–] electrodynamica@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

It absolutely would improve working conditions, competition, and innovation. Right now everything is up to the whims of the capitalists and so there is no free market.

My point is these oligarchs like to pretend they are for basic income when basic income would completely obviate their shit business models and wipe them out.

The whole thing with Twitter and fediverse is the same. He can pretend he is for fediverse all he wants but Twitter would have no reason to exist at that point.

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't he leave Twitter a while back?

[–] isleofmist@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, maybe he should do something about it then. Donate to open source projects maybe?

[–] Windows97@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

they do have that weird twitter/mastodon project that has been looking for a leader for years now

[–] jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, they're allegedly working on a decentralised product, but they won't say "ActivityPub"

Seems like they want to decentralise the web, but still centralise control over the federation protocol

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's going to be blockchain. I'll bet money on it being goddamn blockchain

[–] toneverends@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago
[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

don't forget: for these rich fucks "decentralized" now means "financiarized through cyber-ponzi schemes" (aka "web3")

[–] Whom@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

While this redefining of the term is happening, that isn't what's meant here.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Of course Alexis with his hideous monkey hexagon icon is the one to say that.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Here's a thing I've always wondered: if the blockchain is immutable, meaning nothing can be deleted from it ever, what happens if someone posts something highly illegal like revenge porn, snuff film, or CP on a blockchain-based website?

There absolutely needs to be a way to take that stuff down, otherwise you've basically created a buffet for the monsters that enjoy that stuff, because they'll know that once uploaded it can never be removed and the address to access it can't even be changed.

Also, since possessing such materials is illegal in the vast majority of places (as it should be), wouldn't that mean that the instant such content gets uploaded to the blockchain, everyone storing that blockchain is committing a very serious crime?

I've never seen a serious attempt to address this problem, but it absolutely needs to be addressed! What I have seen though, are blockchain fans implying that they don't want that stuff to be illegal when on a blockchain for the sake of keeping the blockchain intact, which, no, I absolutely disagree with that. Gross.

[–] ora@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

From my understanding, they don't put the content itself on the blockchain but a plaintext permalink. I could be wrong, but since every decentralized node has a full copy of everything on the blockchain it's only feasible to have tiny bits of text.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So then what's the point of using a blockchain then? That just sounds like a normal website with extra steps.

[–] arthur@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

That's exactly it. But you also have to buy our special token and or cryptocurrency.

[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ll believe him when he walks the walk he has been working on a decentralised version of Twitter he knows about activitypub but it’s not good enough for them so he’s creating another new protocol

[–] poVoq@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

This sounds to me like they are building a competitor to Mastodon and Activitypub. One thats under their control (or rather, their investors).

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't believe him that he's going to push for a better future

[–] poVoq@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Better is a question of definition 😅 I think he has a self image of being pretty libertarian, which is not always backed up by what he actually does as a business man, but he is rich enough to retire and work on a libertarian pet project in the future.

Is that going to be good? Who knows. But probably "better" than Twitter.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Hmm I am not optimistic it's going to be better than Twitter.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Ninmi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We really ought to be encouraging these sort of admissions instead of deriding and to get these people to do the right things from now on.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No. He is EXTREMELY influential in the tech field. The fact that he's talking about it while expressing no intentions to actually do anything about it makes it clear that he doesn't actually give a shit. Words are cheap and easy, but they alone also accomplish nothing.

There are a lot of ongoing efforts to decentralize the internet (that aren't blockchain buzzword salad). Fediverse, P2P, BitTorrent, etc. Not to mention that Usenet is still alive. He should put his money and effort where his mouth is if he actually regrets it.

[–] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"The tech executive turned data justice warrior is celebrated as a truth-telling hero, but there’s something a bit too smooth about this narrative arc." -- Maria Farrell, March 5, 2020

[–] sculpordwarfmuffin@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

He knew what he'd been taking part in this whole time but waited till his time card was punched and his millions made before admitting it. Too little, too late.

[–] iam0day@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

At least he is a consistent person unlike other people

[–] seahorse@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Link isn't working